Socio-economic impacts of scaling back a massive payments for ecosystem services programme in China

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2022

• Venue

  Nature Human Behaviour

• Publication date

  2022-07-07

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/s41562-022-01401-yPMID 35798886
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Ethnicity and inequality in China

  2020cited by this paper
• Impact of Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas on household wealth

  2019cited by this paper
• Using referenda to improve targeting and decrease costs of conditional cash transfers

  2019cited by this paper
• From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services

  2018cited by this paper
• Design-based Analysis in Difference-In-Differences Settings with Staggered Adoption

  2018cited by this paper
• The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services

  2018cited by this paper
• The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

  2017cited by this paper
• Long-term effects of payments for environmental services: Combining insights from communication and economics

  2017cited by this paper
• Economic Evolution in China Ecologically Fragile Regions

  2016cited by this paper
• Central–local conflicts in China’s environmental policy implementation: the case of the sloping land conversion program

  2016cited by this paper
• Slippage Effects in Payment for Ecosystem Services in China: The Case of the Sloping Land Conversion Program

  2015cited by this paper
• Evaluation of the Permanence of Land Use Change Induced by Payments for Environmental Services in Quindío, Colombia

  2014cited by this paper
• Impact of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on rural household income: An integrated estimation

  2014cited by this paper
• The implementation and impacts of China's largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data

  2014cited by this paper
• China’s Grain for Green Program: A Review of the Largest Ecological Restoration and Rural Development Program in the World

  2014cited by this paper
• Gender and Sustainability

  2014cited by this paper
• Land Retirement and Nonfarm Labor Market Participation: An Analysis of China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program

  2013cited by this paper
• Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China

  2011cited by this paper
• Relaxing rural constraints: a ‘win-win’ policy for poverty and environment in China?

  2010cited by this paper
• Development and testing of a sustainable environmental restoration policy on eradicating the poverty trap in China's Changting County

  2009cited by this paper
• Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain-for-Green Program on Rural Households in China

  2009cited by this paper
• How sustainable are sustainable development programs? The case of the sloping land conversion program in China.

  2009cited by this paper
• Attitudes of farmers in China's northern Shaanxi Province towards the land-use changes required under the Grain for Green Project, and implications for the project's success

  2009cited by this paper
• Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries

  2008cited by this paper
• Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services

  2008cited by this paper
• An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development

  2008cited by this paper
• Are the poor benefiting from China's land conservation program?

  2007cited by this paper
• Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America

  2005influential reference

• How land property rights affect the effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services: A review

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of green and blue spaces on ecosystem services in Beijing: spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms

  2025cites this paper
• Adopting cost-effective restoration portfolios for multi-objective ecosystem service optimization: A case study from Northern Shaanxi, China

  2025cites this paper
• Funding and productivity: Does winning grants affect the scientific productivity of recipients? Evidence from the social sciences and economics

  2025cites this paper
• The past and future of ecosystem restoration in China.

  2024cites this paper
• Vietnam's Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services scheme's puzzling role in protecting longstanding forests as deforestation rates rise

  2024cites this paper
• Controlling desertification brings positive socioeconomic benefits beyond regional environmental improvement: Evidence from China's Gonghe Basin.

  2024cites this paper
• Constructing a Bayesian belief network to provide insights into the dynamic drivers of ecosystem service relationships

  2024cites this paper
• Continuous Decline in Direct Incomes for Farmers Threatens the Sustainability of the Grain for Green Project

  2024cites this paper
• A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Payment of Ecosystem Services and Farm Household Income in China

  2024cites this paper
• Cash transfers and the Han-Minority household energy poverty gap in rural China

  2024cites this paper
• Cash Transfers and the Han-Minority Household Energy Poverty Gap in Rural China

  2023cites this paper
• Schoolchildren in China’s Protected Areas from a Sustainability Perspective: A Preliminary Study

  2023cites this paper
• Ecosystem Services Research in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis

  2023cites this paper
• What Happens When a Massive Ecological Rehabilitation Program Ends? Evidence from China Using a Quasi-Natural Experiment

  2023cites this paper
• Spatio-Ethnic Household Carbon Footprints in China and the Social Equity Implications of Climate Mitigation Policy

  2023cites this paper
• Socioeconomic outcomes of ecological restoration projects and parallel policies: A case‐study of the agro‐pastoral ecotone in northern China

  2022influential citation