Exploring the influence of coauthorship with top scientists on researchers' affiliation, research topic, productivity, and impact

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2022

• Venue

  J. Informetrics

• Publication date

  2022-08-01

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101314
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Investigating the impact of collaboration with authority authors: a case study of bibliographic data in field of philosophy

  2021cited by this paper
• Changing research topic trends as an effect of publication rankings - The case of German economists and the Handelsblatt Ranking

  2021cited by this paper
• Impact of scientific, economic, geopolitical, and cultural factors on international research collaboration

  2021cited by this paper
• Scientific collaboration and career stages: An ego-centric perspective

  2021cited by this paper
• A network embedding-based scholar assessment indicator considering four facets: Research topic, author credit allocation, field-normalized journal impact, and published time

  2021cited by this paper
• Assessment of author ranking indices based on multi-authorship

  2021cited by this paper
• Reducing Cumulative Errors of Incremental CP Decomposition in Dynamic Online Social Networks

  2021cited by this paper
• Predicting the number of coauthors for researchers: A learning model

  2020cited by this paper
• An exploration on the flow of leading research talents in China: from the perspective of distinguished young scholars

  2020cited by this paper
• The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance

  2020cited by this paper
• Measuring academic influence using heterogeneous author-citation networks

  2019cited by this paper
• Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers

  2019cited by this paper
• A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy

  2019cited by this paper
• Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates

  2018cited by this paper
• Understanding persistent scientific collaboration

  2018cited by this paper
• The collaboration behavior of top scientists

  2018cited by this paper
• Analyzing scientific collaboration with “giants” based on the milestones of career

  2018cited by this paper
• Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers

  2017cited by this paper
• Standing on the shoulders of giants

  2017cited by this paper
• With whom do researchers collaborate and why?

  2017cited by this paper
• Big Scholarly Data: A Survey

  2017cited by this paper
• A personalized people recommender system using global search approach

  2016cited by this paper
• Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting

  2016cited by this paper
• Dancing with the academic elite: a promotion or hindrance of research production?

  2016cited by this paper
• Topic-based heterogeneous rank

  2015cited by this paper
• A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

  2015cited by this paper
• Collaborative research for academic knowledge creation: How team characteristics, motivation, and processes influence research impact

  2015cited by this paper
• A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration

  2014cited by this paper
• Understanding the assembly of interdisciplinary teams and its impact on performance

  2014cited by this paper
• A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation

  2014cited by this paper
• Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900

  2014cited by this paper
• Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks

  2014cited by this paper
• Topic-based Pagerank: toward a topic-level scientific evaluation

  2014cited by this paper
• Studying scientific migration in Scopus

  2013cited by this paper
• Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries

  2012cited by this paper
• The myth of global science collaboration - Collaboration patterns in epistemic communities

  2011cited by this paper
• On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge

  2011cited by this paper
• Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures

  2011cited by this paper
• Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International Assessment

  2011cited by this paper
• Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position

  2011cited by this paper
• The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers

  2010cited by this paper
• An analysis of the connection between researchers’ productivity and their co-authors’ past attributions, including the importance in collaboration networks

  2009cited by this paper
• Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically

  2009cited by this paper
• Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis

  2008cited by this paper
• The write position

  2007cited by this paper
• Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities

  2006cited by this paper
• Derek John de Solla Price memorial award

  2005cited by this paper
• Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship

  2004cited by this paper
• Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities

  2004cited by this paper
• An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration

  2003cited by this paper
• Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?

  2003cited by this paper
• All author citations versus first author citations

  2001cited by this paper
• Citation-Based Auditing of Academic Performance

  1994cited by this paper
• Studies in scientific collaboration - Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship

  1978cited by this paper

• Exploring the Citation and Impact Advantages of Open Access Papers in Hybrid Journals: A Case Study of Biochemistry Publications

  2025cites this paper
• Determination and characteristics of the most visible authors in multi-author publications

  2025cites this paper
• Profiling Brazil’s research elite: Insights from a cluster analysis of a large database

  2025cites this paper
• The innovation trade-off: how following superstars shapes academic novelty

  2025cites this paper
• A nova metodologia do ranking THE: o indicador Força de Pesquisa, a métrica FWCI e as coautorias nas universidades Latino-americanas

  2025cites this paper
• Collaborating with top scientists may not improve paper novelty: A causal analysis based on the propensity score matching method

  2025cites this paper
• The influence of mentorship on medical postgraduates’ academic impact: evidence from China

  2025cites this paper
• Benefits beyond the local network: Does indirect international collaboration ties contribute to research performance for young scientists?

  2025cites this paper
• The Impact and Influence of Academic Genealogies

  2025cites this paper
• Predicting collaborative relationship among scholars by integrating scholars’ content-based and structure-based features

  2024cites this paper
• The relationship between coauthorship and the research impact of medical doctoral students: A social capital perspective

  2024cites this paper
• Transparency of reporting practices in quantitative field studies: The transparency sweet spot for article citations

  2023cites this paper
• Don't follow the leader: Independent thinkers create scientific innovation

  2023cites this paper