OBJECTIVE The emergence of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) has been beneficial in processing administrative and clinical data for quality healthcare information. Despite being patient-centered, a number of these technologies have a fractional consideration of the human-computer interaction, which affects the healthcare professionals as end-users. This attempted to surface the healthcare providers' preferences of an ideal EHR system interface in the community setting. MATERIALS AND METHOD Using an orthogonal main effect design of conjoint analysis, a select group of healthcare providers (n = 300) were asked to sort choice cards, which contains five (5) attributes of EHR interface with specific level. Data were analyzed using Sawtooth v.18 and SPSS v.21. RESULTS High importance was given to color scheme and device platform. Further, the part-worth analysis revealed the preference for an EHR with the following attributes: (a) smartphone device, (b) triadic color, (c) minimalist design, (d) chunked layout and (e) icon-centered menu. DISCUSSION Visual interest and technology needs of the community healthcare providers shaped their preferences. These provide substantial perspectives on how to improve usability of EHR interface systems. CONCLUSION Findings underscored the expanded roles of the healthcare professionals in the successful development of EHR systems.
Understanding healthcare providers' electronic health record (EHR) interface preferences via conjoint analysis
Michael Joseph S. Diño,M. W. Catajan,Christopher Patricio,J. C. Vital,T. J. Gotinga,Ma. Luisa Crisostomo,Maria Lucita Alonzo,Leila Ferrer,Chona Araga,Ronwaldo San Diego,Fe Bartolome,M. L. Uayan,Evangeline Orata,Arfel V. Aguilar,Marissa G. Chua
Published 2023 in Int. J. Medical Informatics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2023
- Venue
Int. J. Medical Informatics
- Publication date
2023-03-01
- Fields of study
Medicine, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-91 of 91 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1