Comparison of two different methods of quantitative coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2002

• Venue

  Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions

• Publication date

  2002-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/ccd.10156PMID 11948889
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A multicenter, randomized study of argatroban versus heparin as adjunct to tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in acute myocardial infarction: myocardial infarction with novastan and TPA (MINT) study.

  1999cited by this paper
• Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment.

  1999cited by this paper
• Significance of automated stenosis detection during quantitative angiography. Insights gained from intracoronary ultrasound imaging.

  1996cited by this paper
• In vivo validation of an experimental adaptive quantitative coronary angiography algorithm to circumvent overestimation of small luminal diameters.

  1995cited by this paper
• Issues of QCA validation:to the editor

  1994cited by this paper
• Issues of QCA validation.

  1994cited by this paper
• A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results.

  1994influential reference
• A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group.

  1994cited by this paper
• Evaluation of Ketanserin in the Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty A Multicenter Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial

  1993cited by this paper
• Visual versus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses: can the angiographer's eye be reeducated?

  1993cited by this paper
• Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials.

  1991cited by this paper
• Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group.

  1990cited by this paper
• Coronary Morphologic andClinical Determinants ofProcedural OutcomeWith Angioplasty forMultivessel Coronary Disease Implications forPatient Selection

  1990cited by this paper
• An on-line system for the quantitative analysis of coronary arterial segments

  1989cited by this paper
• Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction.

  1988cited by this paper
• Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

  1986cited by this paper
• Angiographie morphology and the pathogenesis of unstable angina pectoris

  1985cited by this paper
• Angiographic morphology and the pathogenesis of unstable angina pectoris.

  1985cited by this paper
• A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements.

  1984cited by this paper
• Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography

  1976cited by this paper
• AKUFO AND IBARAPA.

  1965cited by this paper

• Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses.

  2009cites this paper
• Coronary Circulation and Interventional Cardiology

  2005cites this paper
• Quantitative coronary arteriography on digital flat‐panel system

  2004cites this paper