Multivariable modelling for meta‐epidemiological assessment of the association between trial quality and treatment effects estimated in randomized clinical trials

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2007

• Venue

  Statistics in Medicine

• Publication date

  2007-06-30

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Mathematics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/sim.2752PMID 17117373
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

  2006cited by this paper
• Multilevel Statistical Models

  2005cited by this paper
• Multivariate modelling for meta-epidemiological assessment of the association between trial quality and apparent treatment effects in randomised clinical trials (O-075)

  2004cited by this paper
• How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.

  2003cited by this paper
• Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

  2003cited by this paper
• Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

  2002cited by this paper
• Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator.

  2002cited by this paper
• Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research

  2002cited by this paper
• Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses

  2001cited by this paper
• The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration

  2001cited by this paper
• Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experiments.

  2001cited by this paper
• Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

  2001cited by this paper
• A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.

  2000cited by this paper
• Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

  1998cited by this paper
• Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.

  1997cited by this paper
• A Linear Mixed-Effects Model with Heterogeneity in the Random-Effects Population

  1996cited by this paper
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

  1995cited by this paper
• Analysis of longitudinal data

  1994cited by this paper
• Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models

  1993cited by this paper
• Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach

  1993cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

  1986influential reference

• Marginal Improvements in Risk of Bias of Nephrology Randomized Controlled Trials Over Time: A Meta-research Study of Cochrane Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2025cites this paper
• Strength of evidence supporting cancer drug approvals in China between 2017 and 2021: a retrospective analysis.

  2025cites this paper
• Retrospective charts for reporting, analysing, and evaluating disaster emergency response: a systematic review

  2024cites this paper
• The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Heterogeneity in the definition of delirium in ICUs and association with the intervention effect in randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study

  2023cites this paper
• Compelling evidence from meta-epidemiological studies demonstrates overestimation of effects in randomized trials that fail to optimize randomization and blind patients and outcome assessors.

  2023cites this paper
• Meta-analyses frequently include old trials that are associated with a larger intervention effect: a meta-epidemiological study.

  2022cites this paper
• Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies

  2022cites this paper
• A meta-epidemiological study of bias in randomized clinical trials of open and laparoscopic surgery.

  2021cites this paper
• Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults.

  2021cites this paper
• Influence of Sponsorship Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

  2021cites this paper
• Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria among Under-Five Children: A Systematic Review

  2020cites this paper
• Population characteristics as important contextual factors in rheumatological trials: an exploratory meta-epidemiological study from an OMERACT Working Group

  2020cites this paper
• Allocation Concealment and Intention-To-Treat Analysis Do Not Influence the Treatment Effects of Physical Therapy Interventions in Low Back Pain Trials: a Meta-epidemiologic Study.

  2019cites this paper
• Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study

  2018cites this paper
• Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults.

  2017cites this paper
• Blinding in Physical Therapy Trials and Its Association with Treatment Effects: A Meta-epidemiological Study

  2017cites this paper
• Umbrella Reviews, Overviews of Reviews, and Meta-epidemiologic Studies: Similarities and Differences

  2016cites this paper
• Understanding Meta-Epidemiological Studies

  2016cites this paper
• Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates.

  2016influential citation
• Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies

  2016cites this paper
• Pharmacological interventions for delirium in intensive care patients: a protocol for an overview of reviews

  2016cites this paper
• Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review.

  2016cites this paper
• Sample size calculation for meta‐epidemiological studies

  2016cites this paper
• Meta‐epidemiological study: a step‐by‐step approach by using R

  2016cites this paper
• Clinical prediction rules for assisting diagnosis

  2015cites this paper
• Protocol for CHANGE: a randomized clinical trial assessing lifestyle coaching plus care coordination versus care coordination alone versus treatment as usual to reduce risks of cardiovascular disease in adults with schizophrenia and abdominal obesity

  2015cites this paper
• [Individual patient data meta-analyses of randomized trials for the treatment of non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Principles, results and perspectives].

  2015cites this paper
• Incorporating Both Randomized and Observational Data into a Single Analysis

  2015cites this paper
• The accuracy of ultrasound, thermography, photography and sub-epidermal moisture as a predictor of pressure ulcer presence – a systematic review

  2015cites this paper
• Are current standards of reporting quality for clinical trials sufficient in addressing important sources of bias?

  2015cites this paper
• Failure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study

  2015cites this paper
• Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study

  2015cites this paper
• What is the in fl uence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study

  2015cites this paper
• What is the influence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study

  2015cites this paper
• DEPERROR: Risks of systematic errors in drug and non-drug randomized clinical trials assessing intervention effects in patients with unipolar depression.

  2015cites this paper
• Meta-epidemiology

  2014cites this paper
• Light therapy for improving cognition, activities of daily living, sleep, challenging behaviour, and psychiatric disturbances in dementia.

  2014cites this paper
• The Empirical Evidence of Bias in Trials Measuring Treatment Differences

  2014influential citation
• Quantifying Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

  2014influential citation
• Over- and Underdispersion Models

  2014cites this paper
• Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study

  2014cites this paper
• Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study

  2013cites this paper
• Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review.

  2013cites this paper
• No evidence for intervention-dependent influence of methodological features on treatment effect.

  2013cites this paper
• Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study

  2013cites this paper
• Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

  2013cites this paper
• Effects of study precision and risk of bias in networks of interventions: a network meta-epidemiological study.

  2013cites this paper
• Commentary: Meta-epidemiology, meta-meta-epidemiology or network meta-epidemiology?

  2013cites this paper
• Commentary: Meta-epidemiology, meta-meta- epidemiology or network meta-epidemiology?

  2013cites this paper
• Méta-analyses sur données individuelles d’essais randomisés dans les cancers des voies aéro-digestives supérieures. Développements méthodologiques et cliniques

  2013influential citation
• Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials

  2012influential citation
• Effect of methodological quality measures in spinal surgery research: a metaepidemiological study.

  2012cites this paper
• Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias

  2012cites this paper
• Spine surgery research: on and beyond current strategies.

  2012cites this paper
• Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.

  2012cites this paper
• Hepato‐biliary clinical trials and their inclusion in the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group register and reviews

  2011cites this paper
• Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.

  2011cites this paper
• Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data.

  2011cites this paper
• Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.

  2011cites this paper
• Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.

  2011cites this paper
• Assessing covariate imbalance in meta‐analysis studies

  2011cites this paper
• Development of a combined database for meta‐epidemiological research

  2010cites this paper
• Bias and variation in meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials

  2010cites this paper
• Models for potentially biased evidence in meta‐analysis using empirically based priors

  2009cites this paper
• meta-epidemiological study interventions and outcomes: estimates in controlled trials with different Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect

  2009cites this paper
• Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses

  2009cites this paper
• Meta‐analysis: incidence of endoscopic gastric and duodenal ulcers in placebo arms of randomized placebo‐controlled NSAID trials

  2009cites this paper
• Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?

  2009cites this paper
• Quality of randomised trials in COPD

  2009cites this paper
• The effectiveness of physical interventions for people with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review

  2009cites this paper
• Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

  2008cites this paper
• Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies

  2008cites this paper