Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  International Orthopaedics

• Publication date

  2015-04-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00264-014-2533-5PMID 25277762
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• [Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].

  2014cited by this paper
• Biologisch azetabuläre Defektrekonstruktion beim Hüftendoprothesenwechsel mittels „Impaction Grafting“ und azetabulärem Rekonstruktionsring

  2014cited by this paper
• Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review.

  2014cited by this paper
• Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis

  2013cited by this paper
• Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up

  2013cited by this paper
• Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant

  2013cited by this paper
• Reliability of a Complication Classification System for Orthopaedic Surgery

  2012cited by this paper
• Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

  2012cited by this paper
• [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

  2011cited by this paper
• Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future

  2011cited by this paper
• Was tun, wenn die Hüftendoprothese versagt?

  2011cited by this paper
• Restoration of the center of rotation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

  2010cited by this paper
• Azetabuläre Defektrekonstruktion in der Revisionschirurgie der Hüfte

  2009cited by this paper
• [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

  2009cited by this paper
• [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].

  2008cited by this paper
• Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do.

  2007cited by this paper
• Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision Outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years

  2006cited by this paper
• Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians

  2006cited by this paper
• Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5–9 years of follow-up

  2005cited by this paper
• Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.

  2004cited by this paper
• Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component.

  2004cited by this paper
• Ganz reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: indications and medium-term results.

  2004cited by this paper
• Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.

  2003cited by this paper
• Techniques to Improve the Shear Strength of Impacted Bone Graft: The Effect of Particle Size and Washing of the Graft

  2003cited by this paper
• Revision Surgery in Pelvic Discontinuity: An Analysis of Seven Patients

  2002cited by this paper
• The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register

  2002cited by this paper
• [Failure of acetabular cups fixed with cement and thick embedded wire mesh].

  2001cited by this paper
• Allogeneic Cancellous Bone Graft and a Burch-Schneider Ring for Acetabular Reconstruction in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

  2001cited by this paper
• Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring: 42 patients followed for a mean of 10 years

  2001cited by this paper
• [Reconstruction by graft and reinforcement device in severe aseptic acetabular loosening: 10 years survivorship analysis].

  2001cited by this paper
• Die Hakendachschale in der Revision schwieriger gelockerter Hüftprothesenpfannen

  2001cited by this paper
• [Hooked roof cup in revision of difficult loose hip prosthesis cups. Results after a minimum of 10 years].

  2001cited by this paper
• Echec d'une armature métallique grillagée pour le scellement acétabulaire

  2001cited by this paper
• Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years.

  1999cited by this paper
• Total Hip Replacement in Dysplastic Hips Using Femoral Head Shelf Autografts

  1996cited by this paper
• Compressed allograft chips for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty.

  1994cited by this paper
• Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision.

  1994cited by this paper
• Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency.

  1992cited by this paper
• The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula.

  1992cited by this paper
• Yersinia enterocolitica infections and pork: the missing link.

  1987cited by this paper
• Morbidity during hospitalization: can we predict it?

  1987cited by this paper
• A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

  1987cited by this paper
• Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.

  1976cited by this paper
• Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

  1973cited by this paper
• Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

  1969cited by this paper
• Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation.

  1961cited by this paper
• ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP

  1939cited by this paper

• Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Custom Monoflange Acetabular Component for Severe Bone Loss and Pelvic Discontinuity Due to Acetabular Component Loosening: A Case Report

  2024cites this paper
• Survival analysis of 3D printed acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty associated with severe pelvic discontinuities

  2024cites this paper
• Treatment of severe acetabular defects with an antiprotrusio cage and Trabecular Metal augments- clinical and radiographic results after a mean follow-up of 6.6 years.

  2023cites this paper
• Standardized 3D-printed trabecular titanium augment and cup for acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up study

  2023cites this paper
• New Approach to the Anchoring of Macroporous Revision Cups in Large Acetabular Defects a Case Report

  2021cites this paper
• Risk factors for implant failure of custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss and combined pelvic discontinuity

  2021cites this paper
• Comparison of 3D Printing Rapid Prototyping Technology with Traditional Radiographs in Evaluating Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective and Consecutive Study

  2021cites this paper
• Conservación de injerto autólogo de cabeza femoral en colgajo óseo para tratamiento de los defectos acetabulares

  2021cites this paper
• Outcome of repeated multi-stage arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with severe acetabular bone loss: a case series

  2020cites this paper
• Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss

  2019cites this paper
• Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review

  2019cites this paper
• Hüftpfannenwechsel mit einem neuartigen zementfreien „Augment-and-modular-cage“-Revisionssystem (MRS-C)

  2019cites this paper
• The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects—two-year clinical and radiographic results

  2018cites this paper
• [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

  2018cites this paper
• Allogene Knochentransplantation in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik

  2017cites this paper
• Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis

  2017cites this paper
• Reconstruction of AAOS type III and IV acetabular defects with the Ganz reinforcement ring: high failure in pelvic discontinuity

  2017cites this paper
• [The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients].

  2017cites this paper
• Biologisches Downsizing

  2017cites this paper
• Tumorprothesen in der endoprothetischen Revisionschirurgie der unteren Extremität – Ergebnisse von 25 Patienten nach Versorgung mit einem modularen Tumor- und Revisionssystem (MUTARS®)

  2016cites this paper
• [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

  2015cites this paper
• Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty

  2015cites this paper
• Defektadaptierte Rekonstruktionsstrategien in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik

  2015cites this paper
• The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects

  2015cites this paper