Using the blockade of interfascial space of the erector spinae muscle (erector spinae plane block) in minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery: prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Despite the successful development of cardio-anesthesiology, no consensus exists on the preferred anesthesia method for coronary artery bypass grafting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative analgesia in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) using ultrasound-assisted blockade in erector spinae plane (ESP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, two-center, randomized study included 37 patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery. In group 1, before the induction of general anesthesia, an ESP block was performed; in group 2, the operation was performed only under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The consumption of fentanyl for anesthesia differed in groups 1 (ESP block) and 2 (general anesthesia): 0.9 (0.8; 1.0) mg vs 3.0 (2.6; 3.2) mg (p 0.01). The norepinephrine dosage was higher in group 2 than in group 1: 0.18 (0.16; 0.22) mcg/kg/min vs 0.05 (0.04; 0.06) mcg/kg/min (p 0.01). Postoperatively, the pain score was lower in group 1 than in group 2, and no additional opioids were required during the first 34 h after extubation. Thereafter, no differences in pain scores were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of an ESP block with a single injection of a local anesthetic is effective in reducing the total dosage of fentanyl used during surgery, dosage of norepinephrine, and mechanical ventilation and improve the quality of postoperative analgesia during MIDCAB.

• Publication year

  2023

• Venue

  Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management

• Publication date

  2023-03-19

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.17816/ra111806
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Complications Rate Estimation After Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block.

  2021cited by this paper
• Sustained reduction of discharge opioid prescriptions in an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery program: A multilevel generalized linear model.

  2021cited by this paper
• Neuropathic pain

  2021cited by this paper
• Erector spinae plane block for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a double-blind, prospective, randomised placebo-controlled trial—a study protocol

  2021cited by this paper
• Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial.

  2020cited by this paper
• Complication rate of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block for breast surgery

  2020cited by this paper
• Peripheral nerve blocks and ultrasound navigation

  2020cited by this paper
• Влияние ингаляционной и эпидуральной анестезии на развитие осложнений после аортокоронарного шунтирования

  2019cited by this paper
• Risk of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation After Cardiac Surgery: Predicting the Unpredictable?

  2019cited by this paper
• Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Narrative Review of its Application in Cardiac Surgery.

  2019cited by this paper
• Thoracic paravertebral blockade in breast surgery: Is pneumothorax an appreciable concern? A review of over 1000 cases

  2018cited by this paper
• ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ УСКОРЕННОЙ РЕАБИЛИТАЦИИ ПОСЛЕ ЭНДОПРОТЕЗИРОВАНИЯ ТАЗОБЕДРЕННОГО И КОЛЕННОГО СУСТАВОВ (ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ)

  2017cited by this paper
• Continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  2016cited by this paper
• A French Nationwide Survey on Anesthesiologist-Perceived Barriers to the Use of Epidural and Paravertebral Block in Thoracic Surgery.

  2015cited by this paper
• A systematic review of therapeutic interventions to reduce acute and chronic post-surgical pain after amputation, thoracotomy or mastectomy*

  2014cited by this paper
• Benefits and risks of epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery.

  2014cited by this paper
• Epidural Hematoma After Thoracic Epidural Catheter Removal in the Absence of Risk Factors

  2003cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.