“Technical” Contributors and Authorship Distribution in Health Science

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2023

• Venue

  Science and Engineering Ethics

• Publication date

  2023-06-21

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Philosophy, Computer Science, Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11948-023-00445-1PMID 37341846
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Authorship climate: A new tool for studying ethical issues in authorship

  2022cited by this paper
• An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication

  2022cited by this paper
• Statistical advising: Professional development opportunities for the biostatistician

  2022cited by this paper
• Evolution and adoption of contributor role ontologies and taxonomies

  2022cited by this paper
• Implementing an evidence-based competency model for science team training and evaluation: TeamMAPPS

  2021cited by this paper
• Authorship Trends in the Rheumatology Literature, 1990–2020

  2021cited by this paper
• Who writes dermatology randomized controlled trials? The need to specify the role of medical writers

  2021cited by this paper
• What's the Point of Authors?

  2021cited by this paper
• Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth by Stuart Ritchie

  2021cited by this paper
• Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices

  2021cited by this paper
• The importance of acknowledging statisticians as named authors

  2020cited by this paper
• Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors

  2020cited by this paper
• Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles

  2020cited by this paper
• Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility

  2020cited by this paper
• Labor Out of Place: On the Varieties and Valences of (In)visible Labor in Data-Intensive Science

  2020cited by this paper
• Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices

  2020cited by this paper
• How Data Scientists Use Computational Notebooks for Real-Time Collaboration

  2019cited by this paper
• Transparent Attribution of Contributions to Research: Aligning Guidelines to Real-Life Practices

  2019cited by this paper
• Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science

  2019cited by this paper
• The contributor roles for randomized controlled trials and the proposal for a novel CRediT-RCT.

  2019cited by this paper
• Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals

  2018cited by this paper
• Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice

  2018cited by this paper
• Honorary authorship and symbolic violence

  2017cited by this paper
• The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy

  2017cited by this paper
• Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication

  2017cited by this paper
• Coin of the Realm: Practical Procedures for Determining Authorship

  2017cited by this paper
• Building the biomedical data science workforce

  2017cited by this paper
• Authorship Norms and Project Structures in Science

  2017cited by this paper
• Best Practices for Biostatistical Consultation and Collaboration in Academic Health Centers

  2016cited by this paper
• Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production

  2016cited by this paper
• A Simple Framework for Evaluating Authorial Contributions for Scientific Publications

  2016cited by this paper
• Authorship issues in multi-centre clinical trials: the importance of making an authorship contract.

  2015cited by this paper
• Rethinking Authorship in the Era of Collaborative Research

  2015cited by this paper
• Bringing the lab back in: Personnel composition and scientific output at the MIT Department of Biology

  2015cited by this paper
• Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications

  2015cited by this paper
• Authorship policies of scientific journals

  2015cited by this paper
• Vivien Thomas: Master Craftsman, Gifted Teacher, and Unsung Hero

  2015cited by this paper
• Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills

  2014cited by this paper
• Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad Apple Approach

  2014cited by this paper
• Publishing: Credit where credit is due

  2014cited by this paper
• Ortak Çalişma ve Ekip Bilimi: Teoriden Pratiğe * Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice

  2013cited by this paper
• Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit

  2013cited by this paper
• Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apple Approach

  2013cited by this paper
• Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles

  2013cited by this paper
• Misused honorary authorship is no excuse for quantifying the unquantifiable

  2012cited by this paper
• Collaboration and Team Science

  2012cited by this paper
• “Author TBD”: Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research

  2012cited by this paper
• redit where credit is due ? The impact of project contributions and social factors n authorship and inventorship

  2012cited by this paper
• How Industry Uses the ICMJE Guidelines to Manipulate Authorship—And How They Should Be Revised

  2011cited by this paper
• Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it

  2011cited by this paper
• The Road We Must Take: Multidisciplinary Team Science

  2010cited by this paper
• Becoming an Ethical Scholarly Writer

  2010cited by this paper
• Library and Information Science Doctoral Education: The Landscape from 1930-2007

  2009cited by this paper
• Programmers, Professors, and Parasites: Credit and Co-Authorship in Computer Science

  2009cited by this paper
• Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity.

  2008cited by this paper
• Keeping the culture alive: the laboratory technician in mid-twentieth-century British medical research

  2008cited by this paper
• Authors, Ghosts, Damned Lies, and Statisticians

  2007cited by this paper
• The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge

  2007cited by this paper
• Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors

  2006cited by this paper
• An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility

  2006cited by this paper
• Science of Science and Reflexivity

  2006cited by this paper
• Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines

  2005cited by this paper
• In search of Vivien Thomas.

  2005cited by this paper
• The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism

  2005cited by this paper
• A Black Technician and Blue Babies

  2003cited by this paper
• Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers.

  2003cited by this paper
• Managing Laboratory Work through Skepticism: Processes of Evaluation and Control

  2001cited by this paper
• Criteria for authorship for statisticians in medical papers.

  1998cited by this paper
• Authorship

  1997cited by this paper
• A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science

  1997cited by this paper
• Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin.

  1994cited by this paper
• In the Backrooms of Science

  1994cited by this paper
• In the Backrooms of Science: The Work of Technicians in Science Labs. EQW Working Papers WP11.

  1993cited by this paper
• The Invisible Technician

  1989cited by this paper
• Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts

  1981cited by this paper
• The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason

  1975cited by this paper
• Collaboration in the Professional Growth of American Sociology

  1973cited by this paper
• The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

  1964cited by this paper
• Logic in Practice

  1934cited by this paper
• Academic Editor: Liz Wager, United Kingdom

  year unknowncited by this paper

• From ‘exceptionalism’ to authors’ rights: Fairer publishing policies for more impactful science

  2026cites this paper
• Implementation, barriers, and improvement strategies for CRediT: A scoping review.

  2025cites this paper
• How does academia recognize the contribution of scientific data? Evidence from data contributors’ authorship

  2025cites this paper
• Geography of authorship: How geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science

  2024cites this paper
• Clarifying middle authorship contributions to reduce abuses in science publishing and assessment of top-ranked SJR biochemistry and pharmacology journals’ authorship criteria

  2024cites this paper