Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

• Publication date

  2015-03-21

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Linguistics, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0820-9PMID 25794478
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Distal rhythm influences whether or not listeners hear a word in continuous speech: support for a perceptual grouping hypothesis.

  2014cited by this paper
• Long-Term Temporal Tracking of Speech Rate Affects Spoken-Word Recognition

  2014cited by this paper
• Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension

  2013cited by this paper
• Predictions in speech comprehension: fMRI evidence on the meter-semantic interface

  2013cited by this paper
• A lexically biased attentional set compensates for variable speech quality caused by pronunciation variation

  2012cited by this paper
• A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature

  2012cited by this paper
• Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension

  2012cited by this paper
• Predicting acoustically reduced words in spontaneous speech: The role of semantic/ syntactic and acoustic cues in context

  2012cited by this paper
• Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation.

  2011cited by this paper
• Effects of energetic and informational masking on speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers

  2010cited by this paper
• Altering Context Speech Rate Can Cause Words to Appear or Disappear

  2010cited by this paper
• Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation☆

  2010cited by this paper
• Event-related Brain Potentials Suggest a Late Interaction of Meter and Syntax in the P600

  2009cited by this paper
• Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms

  2008cited by this paper
• Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.

  2007cited by this paper
• Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation.

  2007cited by this paper
• Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.

  2006cited by this paper
• Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework.

  2005cited by this paper
• Temporally Nonadjacent Nonlinguistic Sounds Affect Speech Categorization

  2005cited by this paper
• The recognition of reduced word forms.

  2002cited by this paper
• Knowing a Word Affects the Fundamental Perception of The Sounds Within it

  2001cited by this paper
• Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics

  1998cited by this paper
• The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech.

  1997cited by this paper
• Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: evidence from priming.

  1995cited by this paper
• The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆

  1991cited by this paper
• Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition.

  1987cited by this paper
• A distinction between the effects of sentential speaking rate and semantic congruity on word identification

  1984cited by this paper
• Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception.

  1982cited by this paper
• Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech

  1978cited by this paper
• Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context

  1974cited by this paper

• Are individual differences in lexical and coarticulatory biases linked across speech tasks?

  2026cites this paper
• Is rate-dependent perception affected by linguistic information about the intended syllable rate?

  2025cites this paper
• Individual differences in the use of top-down versus bottom-up cues to resolve phonetic ambiguity

  2024cites this paper
• An acoustic study of rhythmic synchronization with natural English speech

  2023cites this paper
• Speech Rate and Turn-Transition Pause Duration in Dutch and English Spontaneous Question-Answer Sequences

  2023cites this paper
• Temporal expectations and the interpretation of timing cues to word boundaries

  2022cites this paper
• Microsoft Reading Progress as Capt Tool

  2022cites this paper
• How versatility performance influences perception of charismatic speech

  2021cites this paper
• Phonetic detail is used to predict a word's morphological composition

  2021cites this paper
• The Role of Segmental Information in Syntactic Processing Through the Syntax–Prosody Interface

  2020cites this paper
• Knowledge-based and signal-based cues are weighted flexibly during spoken language comprehension.

  2020cites this paper
• Encoding and decoding of meaning through structured variability in intonational speech prosody.

  2019cites this paper
• Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables

  2018cites this paper
• Pace, Emotion, and Language Tonality on Speech-to-song Illusion

  2018cites this paper
• Contextual speech rate influences morphosyntactic prediction and integration

  2018cites this paper
• Predictability and perception for native and non-native listeners

  2018cites this paper
• Word segmentation cues in the process of spoken language

  2018cites this paper
• Revisiting Neil Armstrongs Moon-Landing Quote: Implications for Speech Perception, Function Word Reduction, and Acoustic Ambiguity

  2016cites this paper
• Informational masking of multi talker babble in English vowel identification for Spanish-English bilinguals

  2016cites this paper
• Age-Related Differences in Speech Rate Perception Do Not Necessarily Entail Age-Related Differences in Speech Rate Use.

  2015cites this paper