Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  Computational Statistics & Data Analysis

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Computer Science, Mathematics

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.030
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Bayesian variable selection for Poisson regression with underreported responses

  2010cited by this paper
• Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of the disease

  2009cited by this paper
• The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests

  2008cited by this paper
• EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified

  2008cited by this paper
• The Effect of Verification Bias in the Naïve Estimators of Accuracy of a Binary Diagnostic Test

  2007cited by this paper
• Risk of Error and the Kappa Coefficient of a Binary Diagnostic Test in the Presence of Partial Verification

  2007cited by this paper
• Multiple imputation for the comparison of two screening tests in two‐phase Alzheimer studies

  2007cited by this paper
• Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias

  2006cited by this paper
• Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias

  2006cited by this paper
• Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation

  2005cited by this paper
• Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Absence of a Perfect Gold-Standard Test: A Review of the Statistical and Epidemiologic Issues

  2005cited by this paper
• Comparing the Likelihood Ratios of Two Binary Diagnostic Tests in the Presence of Partial Verification

  2005cited by this paper
• Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Prevalence and Diagnostic Test Studies in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test

  2004cited by this paper
• On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies

  2004cited by this paper
• Categorical Data Analysis

  2003cited by this paper
• Novel designs for multi‐arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer

  2003cited by this paper
• Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic Tests

  2003cited by this paper
• A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present

  2003cited by this paper
• Analytic methods for comparing two dichotomous screening or diagnostic tests applied to two populations of differing disease prevalence when individuals negative on both tests are unverified

  2002cited by this paper
• Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine

  2002cited by this paper
• Comparing accuracies of two screening tests in a two‐phase study for dementia

  2002cited by this paper
• Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of disease

  2002cited by this paper
• Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion

  2001cited by this paper
• Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy

  1998cited by this paper
• Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions

  1998cited by this paper
• Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy

  1998cited by this paper
• Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance.

  1997cited by this paper
• Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values.

  1994cited by this paper
• Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias

  1993cited by this paper
• Using EM to Obtain Asymptotic Variance-Covariance Matrices: The SEM Algorithm

  1991cited by this paper
• How many patients are necessary to assess test performance?

  1990cited by this paper
• The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests.

  1985cited by this paper
• Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

  1983cited by this paper
• INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA

  1975cited by this paper

• Sample size calculation for comparing two screening tests when the gold standard is missing at random

  2024cites this paper
• Determining sample size for a binary diagnostic test in the presence of verification bias

  2018cites this paper
• The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen: developing a new screening test for mild cognitive impairment and dementia

  2015cites this paper
• Second Issue for Computational Statistics for Clinical Research

  2012cites this paper
• Intervalos de confianza y contrastes de hipótesis para parámetros de tests diagnósticos binarios

  2011cites this paper
• Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random

  2010cites this paper
• Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification

  2010cites this paper
• Bayesian variable selection for Poisson regression with underreported responses

  2010cites this paper