Stakeholder perspectives and reactions to “academic” cognitive enhancement: Unsuspected meaning of ambivalence and analogies

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Public Understanding of Science

• Publication date

  2012-07-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Education, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/0963662510385062PMID 23823168
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research

  2010cited by this paper
• Pragmatic Neuroethics: Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain

  2010influential reference
• Cognitive Enhancement, Lifestyle Choice or Misuse of Prescription Drugs?

  2010influential reference
• Modafinil in the media: Metaphors, medicalisation and the body

  2009cited by this paper
• Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement

  2009cited by this paper
• Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges

  2009cited by this paper
• Expectations regarding cognitive enhancement create substantial challenges

  2009influential reference
• Autonomy and Coercion in Academic “Cognitive Enhancement” Using Methylphenidate: Perspectives of Key Stakeholders

  2009influential reference
• Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy

  2008cited by this paper
• :Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science: Essential Readings in Neuroethics.

  2008cited by this paper
• Misuse and diversion of stimulants prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review of the literature.

  2008cited by this paper
• Waking up to sleepiness: Modafinil, the media and the pharmaceuticalisation of everyday/night life.

  2008cited by this paper
• Ethics Review Committee approval and informed consent: an analysis of biomedical publications originating from Sri Lanka

  2008influential reference
• Enhancing concentration, mood and memory in healthy individuals: An empirical study of attitudes among general practitioners and the general population

  2008cited by this paper
• Enhancing, not cheating.

  2007cited by this paper
• Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die

  2007cited by this paper
• Stimulant Medication Use, Misuse, and Abuse in an Undergraduate and Graduate Student Sample

  2006cited by this paper
• Justice, Fairness, and Enhancement

  2006cited by this paper
• The difference between steroids and Ritalin is...

  2005cited by this paper
• Amphetamine improves cognitive function in medicated individuals with schizophrenia and in healthy volunteers.

  2005cited by this paper
• Authenticity and Ambivalence: Toward Understanding the Enhancement Debate

  2005cited by this paper
• fMRI in the public eye

  2005cited by this paper
• International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics

  2005cited by this paper
• Judgments of the Fairness of Using Performance Enhancing Drugs

  2005cited by this paper
• Methylphenidate Does Not Improve Cognitive Function in Healthy Sleep-Deprived Young Adults

  2004cited by this paper
• The case against perfection: what's wrong with designer children, bionic athletes, and genetic engineering.

  2004cited by this paper
• Ethical issues in taking neuroscience research from bench to bedside.

  2004cited by this paper
• Creativity, gratitude, and the enhancement debate

  2004cited by this paper
• Is It Ethical to Use Enhancement Technologies to Make Us Better than Well?

  2004influential reference
• Student Perceptions of Methylphenidate Abuse at a Public Liberal Arts College

  2000cited by this paper
• Methylphenidate Enhances Working Memory by Modulating Discrete Frontal and Parietal Lobe Regions in the Human Brain

  2000cited by this paper
• Effects of methylphenidate on spatial working memory and planning in healthy young adults

  1997cited by this paper
• Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics

  1991cited by this paper
• Metaphors We Live by

  1982cited by this paper
• Human Nature and Conduct

  1921cited by this paper

• Parents’ Perceptions on the Debated Parenting Practice of Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Children and Adolescents

  2022influential citation
• Acceptability of Neuroscientific Interventions in Education

  2021cites this paper
• Concept generation of cognitive enhancement: healthcare professionals' approach towards the impact and utilization of cognitive enhancers in academic context

  2021cites this paper
• Professionals’ attitudes towards the use of cognitive enhancers in academic settings

  2020cites this paper
• Osteopathic Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards Different Modalities of Neuroenhancement: a Pilot Study

  2020cites this paper
• Identifying approaches for synthesizing and summarizing information to support informed citizen deliberations in health policy: a scoping review

  2020cites this paper
• Osteopathic Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards Different Modalities of Neuroenhancement: a Pilot Study

  2020cites this paper
• A Familiar Landscape in the Brave New World: Ethics of Cognitive Enhancement Introduction

  2020cites this paper
• Psychiatrists’ attitudes towards and willingness to prescribe cognitive enhancers in academic settings

  2020cites this paper
• Gendered aspects of Danish students’ non-medical use of prescription pharmaceuticals for enhancement purposes in the ‘performance society’

  2019cites this paper
• Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement: The Role of Metaphor and Context

  2019cites this paper
• Building Conceptions of Cognitive Enhancement: University Students’ Views on the Effects of Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancers

  2019cites this paper
• Cognitive Enhancement vs. Plagiarism: a Quantitative Study on the Attitudes of an Italian Sample

  2019cites this paper
• Cognitive Enhancers (CE) and Learning Strategies

  2018cites this paper
• Cognitive Enhancers (CE) and Learning Strategies

  2018cites this paper
• Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancer Use Among New Zealand Tertiary Students

  2017cites this paper
• “At Such a Good School, Everybody Needs It”: Contested Meanings of Prescription Stimulant Use in College Academics

  2017cites this paper
• tDCS for Memory Enhancement: Analysis of the Speculative Aspects of Ethical Issues

  2017cites this paper
• How to Think About Enhancement: A Welfarist Approach

  2017cites this paper
• Technologies of the self in public health: insights from public deliberations on cognitive and behavioural enhancement

  2017cites this paper
• Le concept de double-usage de la recherche : un outil diagnostique de l’analyse éthique des risques associés aux usages neuroamélioratifs de la recherche en neurosciences

  2016cites this paper
• Scepticism and hope in a complex predicament: People with addictions deliberate about neuroscience.

  2016cites this paper
• The is and ought of the Ethics of Neuroenhancement: Mind the Gap

  2016cites this paper
• From ‘Hard’ Neuro-Tools to ‘Soft’ Neuro-Toys? Refocussing the Neuro-Enhancement Debate

  2016cites this paper
• The Myth of Cognitive Enhancement Drugs

  2015cites this paper
• With Cognitive Enhancement Comes Great Responsibility

  2015cites this paper
• Popular media and bioethics scholarship: sharing responsibility for portrayals of cognitive enhancement with prescription medication

  2015cites this paper
• Empirical Support for the Moral Salience of the Therapy-Enhancement Distinction in the Debate Over Cognitive, Affective and Social Enhancement

  2015cites this paper
• Knowledge, Experiences and Views of German University Students Toward Neuroenhancement: An Empirical-Ethical Analysis

  2015cites this paper
• Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement

  2014influential citation
• Perceptions of assisted cognitive and sport performance enhancement among university students in England

  2014cites this paper
• Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement

  2014cites this paper
• Generating genius: how an Alzheimer’s drug became considered a ‘cognitive enhancer’ for healthy individuals

  2014cites this paper
• Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement—a review

  2014cites this paper
• The value and pitfalls of speculation about science and technology in bioethics: the case of cognitive enhancement

  2014cites this paper
• Knowledge, Experiences and Views of German University Students Toward Neuroenhancement: An Empirical-Ethical Analysis

  2014cites this paper
• Outstanding questions concerning the regulation of cognitive enhancement devices†

  2014cites this paper
• The value and pitfalls of speculation about science and technology in bioethics: the case of cognitive enhancement

  2014cites this paper
• Australian university students' attitudes towards the use of prescription stimulants as cognitive enhancers: perceived patterns of use, efficacy and safety.

  2013cites this paper
• Cognitive Enhancement

  2013influential citation
• Does the Cognitive Enhancement Debate Call for a Renewal of the Deliberative Role of Bioethics

  2013influential citation
• Australian University Students’ Attitudes Towards the Acceptability and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals to Improve Academic Performance

  2013cites this paper
• The Indirect Psychological Costs of Cognitive Enhancement

  2013cites this paper
• How Research on Stakeholder Perspectives Can Inform Policy on Cognitive Enhancement

  2013cites this paper
• Wish-fulfilling medicine in practice: the opinions and arguments of lay people

  2013cites this paper
• Ideologies of intellect: a critical examination of the hype surrounding cognitive enhancement

  2012cites this paper
• Australian University Students’ Attitudes Towards the Acceptability and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals to Improve Academic Performance

  2012influential citation
• Added Stakeholders, Added Value(s) to the Cognitive Enhancement Debate: Are Academic Discourse and Professional Policies Sidestepping Values of Stakeholders?

  2012cites this paper
• Considering the Causes and Implications of Ambivalence in Using Medicine for Enhancement

  2011cites this paper