SCIENCE@home

Cardiac magnetic resonance parameters associated with successful conversion from a single ventricular to a one-and-a-half or biventricular circulation in patients with a hypoplastic right ventricle

Deepa Prasad,Jennifer Romanowicz,Puja Banka,R. Beroukhim,Sunil J. Ghelani,S. Emani,Andrew J. Powell

Published 2023 in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ABSTRACT

Background Some patients with pulmonary atresia with an intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS) or a left ventricle dominant atrioventricular canal defect (LDAVC) with a hypoplastic right ventricle (RV) and univentricular (1 V) circulation may be candidates for conversion to either a complete biventricular (2 V) repair or a one-and-a-half ventricle repair (1.5 V). We sought to identify pre-operative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) findings associated with successful conversion from 1V to 1.5V or 2V circulation. Methods In this single center retrospective study, subjects with PA/IVS or LDAVC and no conotruncal abnormalities were included if they had a 1 V circulation at the time of CMR followed by a surgical intervention intended to convert them to a 1.5 V or 2 V circulation. Conversion failure was defined as any of the following: (1) oxygen saturation < 90% at the most recent follow-up, (2) conversion back to a 1.5 V or 1 V circulation, or (3) death. Results In the PA/IVS cohort (n = 15, median age 1.32 years), 10 patients underwent surgical conversion to a 1.5 V circulation and 5 to a 2 V circulation. In the attempted 1.5 V group, there were 2 failures, and these cases had a lower RV mass (p = 0.04). In the attempted 2 V group, there was 1 failure, and no CMR parameters were significantly different compared to the successes. Among the successful 2 V group patients, the minimum RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) was 27 ml/m^2. In the LDAVC cohort (n = 15, median age 1.0 years), 1 patient underwent surgical conversion to a 1.5 V circulation and 14 patients to a 2 V circulation. In the attempted 1.5 V group, the 1 conversion was a failure and had an RV EDV of 15 ml/m^2. In the attempted 2 V group, there were 2 failures, and these cases had a smaller RV:LV stroke volume ratio (p = 0.05) and a lower RV ejection fraction (p = 0.05) compared to the successes. Among the successful 2 V group patients, the minimum RV EDV was 22 ml/m^2. Conclusions We identified multiple CMR parameters associated with successful conversion from 1 V circulation to 1.5 V or 2 V circulation in patients with PA/IVS and LDAVC. This information may improve patient selection for conversion procedures and encourage larger studies to better define the role of CMR.

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-17 of 17 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-6 of 6 citing papers · Page 1 of 1