Justifying the judgment process a ff ects confidence but neither accuracy , nor strategy use

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Similar task features shape judgment and categorization processes.

  2016cited by this paper
• Pillars of judgment: how memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments.

  2014cited by this paper
• Is pressure stressful? The impact of pressure on the stress response and category learning

  2013cited by this paper
• Deliberation’s Blindsight

  2013cited by this paper
• Adult age differences in categorization and multiple-cue judgment.

  2012cited by this paper
• Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making.

  2012cited by this paper
• The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance

  2011influential reference
• Choking under pressure: multiple routes to skill failure.

  2011influential reference
• Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.

  2010cited by this paper
• Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.

  2008cited by this paper
• The mapping model: a cognitive theory of quantitative estimation.

  2008cited by this paper
• Insight and strategy in multiple-cue learning.

  2006cited by this paper
• Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.

  2006cited by this paper
• Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.

  2006cited by this paper
• Effects of Accountability on Rating Behavior and Rater Accuracy

  2003cited by this paper
• Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift.

  2002cited by this paper
• The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

  2001cited by this paper
• Effects of Reasons Analysis on the Accuracy of Predicting Basketball Games1

  1999cited by this paper
• Accounting for the effects of accountability.

  1999influential reference
• Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments

  1996cited by this paper
• Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality

  1996cited by this paper
• Effects of introspecting about reasons: inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts.

  1995cited by this paper
• An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High-Stakes Decisions

  1995cited by this paper
• Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven's advanced progressive matrices: Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants

  1995cited by this paper
• Why Do I Love Thee?: Effects of Repeated Introspections about a Dating Relationship on Attitudes toward the Relationship

  1993cited by this paper
• Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance

  1992cited by this paper
• The assessment of self-insight in judgment policies

  1992cited by this paper
• Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.

  1991cited by this paper
• Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaid.

  1990cited by this paper
• Pressure And Performance In Accounting Decision Settings - Paradoxical Effects Of Incentives, Feedback, And Justification

  1990cited by this paper
• A note on the assessment of self-insight in judgment research

  1989cited by this paper
• Cognitive Loafing

  1988cited by this paper
• Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task.

  1987cited by this paper
• Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process?

  1983cited by this paper
• Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.

  1977cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.