CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project

This paper describes the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) project, which promotes the use of a unique model dataset, performed with the Community Earth System Model, with the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model as its atmospheric component [CESM1(WACCM)], to investigate global and regional impacts of geoengineering. The performed simulations were designed to achieve multiple simultaneous climate goals, by strategically placing sulfur injections at four different locations in the stratosphere, unlike many earlier studies that targeted globally averaged surface temperature by placing injections in regions at or around the equator. This advanced approach reduces some of the previously found adverse effects of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, including uneven cooling between the poles and the equator and shifts in tropical precipitation. The 20-member ensemble increases the ability to distinguish between forced changes and changes due to climate variability in global and regional climate variables in the coupled atmosphere, land, sea ice, and ocean system. We invite the broader community to perform in-depth analyses of climate-related impacts and to identify processes that lead to changes in the climate system as the result of a strategic application of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Bulletin of The American Meteorological Society - (BAMS)

• Publication date

  2018-11-01

• Fields of study

  Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Stratospheric Response in the First Geoengineering Simulation Meeting Multiple Surface Climate Objectives

  2018cited by this paper
• Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Effects of Different Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics

  2018cited by this paper
• Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination

  2018cited by this paper
• The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations

  2017cited by this paper
• Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM)

  2017cited by this paper
• First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives

  2017cited by this paper
• Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO 2 injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model

  2017cited by this paper
• Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency

  2017cited by this paper
• Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions, 1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM)

  2016cited by this paper
• Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario

  2016cited by this paper
• What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO 2

  2015cited by this paper
• Geoengineering as a design problem

  2015cited by this paper
• The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability

  2015cited by this paper
• The detectability of climate engineering

  2015cited by this paper
• Arctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation under the GeoMIP G1 scenario

  2014cited by this paper
• Modifications of the quasi‐biennial oscillation by a geoengineering perturbation of the stratospheric aerosol layer

  2014cited by this paper
• Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

  2014cited by this paper
• Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering

  2014cited by this paper
• The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

  2013cited by this paper
• Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall

  2013cited by this paper
• Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

  2013cited by this paper
• Climate change from 1850 to 2005 simulated in CESM1(WACCM)

  2013cited by this paper
• The great sea-ice dwindle

  2012cited by this paper
• Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5

  2012cited by this paper
• Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate

  2012cited by this paper
• The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions

  2012cited by this paper
• Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2: climate responses simulated by four earth system models

  2012cited by this paper
• The CCSM4 Ocean Component

  2012cited by this paper
• A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization

  2006cited by this paper
• Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?

  2006cited by this paper
• Atlantic hurricanes and natural variability in 2005

  2006cited by this paper
• Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO 2 Injections

  year unknowncited by this paper
• Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Locations

  year unknowncited by this paper

• World Climate Research Programme lighthouse activity: an assessment of major research gaps in solar radiation modification research

  2025cites this paper
• Macroclimate growing conditions for luxury crops after stratospheric aerosol injection

  2025cites this paper
• Africa’s regional and local climate response to stratospheric aerosol injection characteristics

  2025cites this paper
• Southeast Asia’s Extreme Precipitation Response to Solar Radiation Management with GLENS Simulations

  2025cites this paper
• The impact of stratospheric aerosol injection: a regional case study

  2025cites this paper
• Simulated response of the climate of eastern Africa to stratospheric aerosol intervention

  2025cites this paper
• Toward an evidence‐informed, responsible, and inclusive debate on solar geoengineering: A response to the proposed non‐use agreement

  2024cites this paper
• Can the Artificial Release of Fluorinated Gases Offset Global Cooling Due to Supervolcanic Eruptions?

  2024cites this paper
• Projected changes to Arctic shipping routes after stratospheric aerosol deployment in the ARISE-SAI scenarios

  2024cites this paper
• Changes in Coastal Upwelling in the Northern Gulf of Guinea under Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

  2024cites this paper
• Impacts of Solar Radiation Management on Hydro-Climatic Extremes in Southeast Asia

  2023influential citation
• Impact of Stratospheric Geoengineering on Sea Surface Temperature in the Northern Gulf of Guinea

  2023cites this paper
• Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Microphysics‐Chemistry Simulations of the 1991 Pinatubo Volcanic Aerosols With Newly Coupled Sectional Aerosol and Stratosphere‐Troposphere Chemistry Modules in the NASA GEOS Chemistry‐Climate Model (CCM)

  2023cites this paper
• Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario

  2023cites this paper
• Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering

  2021influential citation
• OPTIMAL CLIMATE POLICY IN 3D: MITIGATION, CARBON REMOVAL, AND SOLAR GEOENGINEERING

  2021cites this paper
• An earth system governance perspective on solar geoengineering

  2020cites this paper
• Climate engineering to mitigate the projected 21st-century terrestrial drying of the Americas: a direct comparison of carbon capture and sulfur injection

  2020cites this paper
• Robust winter warming over Eurasia under stratospheric sulfate geoengineering – the role of stratospheric dynamics

  2020influential citation
• Weakening of the Extratropical Storm Tracks in Solar Geoengineering Scenarios

  2020cites this paper
• What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario

  2020cites this paper
• Expanding the design space of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to include precipitation-based objectives and explore trade-offs

  2020influential citation
• Tropical Pacific climate variability under solar geoengineering: impacts on ENSO extremes

  2019cites this paper
• Complementing CO2 emission reduction by solar radiation management might strongly enhance future welfare

  2019cites this paper
• Comparing Surface and Stratospheric Impacts of Geoengineering With Different SO2 Injection Strategies

  2019cites this paper
• Climate system response to stratospheric sulfate aerosols: sensitivity to altitude of aerosol layer

  2019cites this paper
• Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering Could Alter the High‐Latitude Seasonal Cycle

  2019influential citation