Lifestyle modification programs

This Evidence Check review explored factors contributing to effective referral to population based lifestyle modification programs for people with chronic disease. It considered factors which influence practitioner referrals to such programs and factors influencing the likelihood of the patient engaging with and completing a program. The reviewers identified barriers and facilitators to referrals by health professionals and to uptake, engagement and completion of programs by patients. The research suggests that for health professionals, involvement in program design, educational activities and practitioner advocates and receiving feedback on program effectiveness may increase referrals. For patients, factors related to the method of referral and personal, environmental and social factors appear to influence likelihood of engagement with and completion of programs.

• Publication year

  2020

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2020-06-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.57022/tlji8520
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Social prescribing: a rapid literature review to inform primary care policy in Australia

  2020cited by this paper
• Towards sustainable healthcare system performance in the 21st century in high-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review of the grey literature

  2019cited by this paper
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)

  2019cited by this paper
• Improving the Monitoring of Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery and Quality: A Call to Action for Australia.

  2019cited by this paper
• General practice referral of ‘at risk’ populations to community leisure services: applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of a community-based physical activity programme for inactive adults with long-term conditions

  2019cited by this paper
• What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review

  2019cited by this paper
• The National Health Service:

  2019cited by this paper
• Patient and Nurse Experiences in a Rural Chronic Disease Management Program: A Qualitative Evaluation

  2018cited by this paper
• Participant perspectives of a 6-month telephone-based lifestyle coaching program.

  2018cited by this paper
• General practitioners’ perspectives on the prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

  2018cited by this paper
• Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review

  2018cited by this paper
• CareMore: Improving Outcomes and Controlling Health Care Spending for High-Needs Patients

  2017cited by this paper
• An education programme influencing health professionals to recommend exercise to their type 2 diabetes patients – understanding the processes: a case study from Oxfordshire, UK

  2017cited by this paper
• Telephone‐delivered weight management services in the hospital outpatient setting: Decision‐makers’ perceptions of their use in routine practice

  2017cited by this paper
• The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation

  2017cited by this paper
• Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence

  2017cited by this paper
• Referral for Expert Physical Activity Counseling: A Pragmatic RCT.

  2017cited by this paper
• Community-based exercise training for people with chronic respiratory and chronic cardiac disease: a mixed-methods evaluation

  2016cited by this paper
• Role of general practice in the utilisation of the NSW Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service.

  2015cited by this paper
• Models of Care for High-Need, High-Cost Patients: An Evidence Synthesis.

  2015cited by this paper
• A Culture in Transition: Paramedic Experiences with Community Referral Programs.

  2015cited by this paper
• Providing integrated care for older people with complex needs Lessons from seven international case studies

  2014cited by this paper
• From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider

  2014cited by this paper
• Do people with existing chronic conditions benefit from telephone coaching? A rapid review.

  2013cited by this paper
• Factors influencing referral to cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs: a systematic review

  2013cited by this paper
• Barriers, facilitators and attitudes influencing health promotion activities in general practice: an explorative pilot study

  2013cited by this paper
• Dropout is a problem in lifestyle intervention programs for overweight and obese infertile women: a systematic review.

  2013cited by this paper
• A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change

  2012cited by this paper
• Engaging general practice nurses in chronic disease self-management support in Australia: insights from a controlled trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

  2012cited by this paper
• Better knowledge, better health: piloting an education intervention in chronic condition self-management support.

  2011cited by this paper
• Public Health Agency of Canada

  2011cited by this paper
• Case management What it is and how it can best be implemented

  2011cited by this paper
• Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

  2011cited by this paper
• The current state of lifestyle intervention implementation research: where do we go next?

  2011cited by this paper
• Levels of Evidence

  2008cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults: systematic review.

  2007cited by this paper
• Prevention of Chronic Disease by Means of Diet and Lifestyle Changes -- Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries

  2006cited by this paper
• Prevention of chronic disease by means of diet and lifestyle changes.

  2006cited by this paper
• Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice

  2005cited by this paper
• Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically

  2002cited by this paper
• The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)

  2002cited by this paper
• Reports from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).

  1995cited by this paper
• World Health Organisation

  1983cited by this paper
• The Commonwealth Fund

  1948cited by this paper
• The King's Fund

  1948cited by this paper
• City Research Online

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.