Show and tell: farmer field days and learning about inputs with heterogeneous yield effects

Organic inputs can be effective in reversing soil degradation and improving crop yields, but are often underused in a developing country context. This study seeks to determine whether farmer field days (FFDs) are effective in disseminating information about novel organic inputs, and the extent to which they increase demand for these products. Using experimental auctions to measure willingness to pay (WTP) among smallholder farmers in Western Kenya, we find that those farmers exposed to information from FFDs related to biochar and vermicompost, novel organic inputs, have lower WTP for the products. We present evidence that this is likely driven by two factors in particular: changes in perceptions of input profitability and heterogeneity in yields across demonstration plots within field day sites.

• Publication year

  2023

• Venue

  European Review of Agricultural Economics

• Publication date

  2023-12-18

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/erae/jbad042
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Experimenting with a green ‘Green Revolution’. Evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Indonesia

  2023cited by this paper
• Improving Willingness-to-Pay Elicitation by Including a Benchmark Good

  2022cited by this paper
• Rural Bangladeshi consumers’ (un)willingness to pay for low‐milled rice: Implications for zinc biofortification

  2022cited by this paper
• Lead-farmer extension and smallholder valuation of new agricultural technologies in Tanzania

  2020cited by this paper
• Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam

  2020cited by this paper
• How Do Farmers Learn from Extension Services? Evidence from Malawi

  2020cited by this paper
• Underground Knowledge: Estimating the Impacts of Soil Information Transfers Through Experimental Auctions†

  2020cited by this paper
• Farmer Field Days and Demonstrator Selection for Increasing Technology Adoption

  2020cited by this paper
• What drives smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya

  2019cited by this paper
• Social Learning and Incentives for Experimentation and Communication

  2018cited by this paper
• Can Network Theory-Based Targeting Increase Technology Adoption?

  2018cited by this paper
• Technology Diffusion, Outcome Variability, and Social Learning: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya

  2018cited by this paper
• Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effects

  2017cited by this paper
• Using Double-Lasso Regression for Principled Variable Selection

  2016cited by this paper
• Measuring rural consumers’ willingness to pay for quality labels using experimental auctions: the case of aflatoxin-free maize in Kenya

  2016cited by this paper
• The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty

  2015cited by this paper
• Noisy Information Signals and Endogenous Preferences for Labeled Attributes

  2015cited by this paper
• Information and Consumer Willingness to Pay for Biofortified Yellow Cassava: Evidence from Experimental Auctions in Nigeria. HarvestPlus Working Paper 13

  2014cited by this paper
• Composting versus vermicomposting: a comparative study of organic matter evolution through straight and combined processes.

  2012cited by this paper
• Improving the Use of Experimental Auctions in Africa: Theory and Evidence

  2011cited by this paper
• Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management

  2011cited by this paper
• Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana

  2010cited by this paper
• Estimating consumer willingness to pay for food quality with experimental auctions: the case of yellow versus fortified maize meal in Kenya: H. De Groote et al. / Agricultural Economics xx (2010) 1-16

  2010cited by this paper
• Evaluation of farmers' field days as a dissemination tool for push-pull technology in Western Kenya.

  2009cited by this paper
• Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice

  2009cited by this paper
• Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Integrated Pest Management Extension Methods: An Example from Bangladesh

  2008cited by this paper
• Consumer acceptance of provitamin A-biofortified maize in Maputo, Mozambique

  2008cited by this paper
• Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors

  2008cited by this paper
• DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES ON THE SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF ADVERTISING , MARKETING , AND PRODUCT DESIGN

  2005cited by this paper
• Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities

  2004cited by this paper
• Testing the initial endowment effect in experimental auctions

  2003cited by this paper
• Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture

  1995cited by this paper
• Quantifying Gains To Risk Diversification Using Certainty Equivalence In A Mean-Variance Model: An Application To Florida Citrus

  1990cited by this paper
• Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method.

  1964cited by this paper

• Try Before You Buy: Experimental Evidence on Willingness to Pay for Tailored Agricultural Advice in Nigeria

  2025cites this paper