The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) are two of the most widely used and well-validated PTSD measures providing total and subscale scores that correspond with DSM-5 PTSD symptoms. However, there is little information about the utility of subscale scores above and beyond the total score for either measure. The current study compared the proposed DSM-5 four-factor model to a bifactor model across both measures using a sample of veterans (N = 1,240) presenting to a Veterans Affairs (VA) PTSD specialty clinic. The correlated factors and bifactor models for both measures evidenced marginal-to-acceptable fit and were retained for further evaluation. Bifactor specific indices suggested that both measures exhibited a strong general factor but weak lower-order factors. Structural regressions revealed that most of the lower-order factors provided little utility in predicting relevant outcomes. Although additional research is needed to make definitive statements about the utility of PCL-5 and CAPS-5 subscales, study findings point to numerous weaknesses. As such, caution should be exercised when using or interpreting subscale scores in future research.
A Bifactor Evaluation of Self-Report and Clinician-Administered Measures of PTSD in Veterans
Amanda M. Raines,Kate Clauss,Dustin Seidler,Nicholas P. Allan,Jon D. Elhai,J. Vasterling,J. Constans,Kelly P. Maieritsch,C. Franklin
Published 2024 in Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2024
- Venue
Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)
- Publication date
2024-02-12
- Fields of study
Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-47 of 47 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-1 of 1 citing papers · Page 1 of 1