"I Don't Know If We're Doing Good. I Don't Know If We're Doing Bad": Investigating How Practitioners Scope, Motivate, and Conduct Privacy Work When Developing AI Products

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  USENIX Security Symposium

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Privacy in the Time of Language Models

  2023cited by this paper
• Understanding Challenges for Developers to Create Accurate Privacy Nutrition Labels

  2022cited by this paper
• SoK: Social Cybersecurity

  2022cited by this paper
• Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems

  2022cited by this paper
• The Security & Privacy Acceptance Framework (SPAF)

  2022influential reference
• How Does Usable Security (Not) End Up in Software Products? Results From a Qualitative Interview Study

  2022influential reference
• Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned

  2022cited by this paper
• This Person (Probably) Exists. Identity Membership Attacks Against GAN Generated Faces

  2021cited by this paper
• PATE-AAE: Incorporating Adversarial Autoencoder into Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles for Spoken Command Classification

  2021cited by this paper
• Security Notifications in Static Analysis Tools: Developers’ Attitudes, Comprehension, and Ability to Act on Them

  2021cited by this paper
• Privacy Champions in Software Teams: Understanding Their Motivations, Strategies, and Challenges

  2021influential reference
• PrivacyFlash Pro: Automating Privacy Policy Generation for Mobile Apps

  2021cited by this paper
• On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜

  2021cited by this paper
• How Developers Talk About Personal Data and What It Means for User Privacy

  2021cited by this paper
• Privacy Harms

  2021cited by this paper
• Exploring the Utility Versus Intrusiveness of Dynamic Audience Selection on Facebook

  2021cited by this paper
• Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models

  2020cited by this paper
• Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning in the Wild: Membership Inference Attacks against Transfer Learning

  2020cited by this paper
• Hacked Time: Design and Evaluation of a Self-Efficacy Based Cybersecurity Game

  2020cited by this paper
• Co-Designing Checklists to Understand Organizational Challenges and Opportunities around Fairness in AI

  2020cited by this paper
• Understanding Privacy-Related Questions on Stack Overflow

  2020cited by this paper
• Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI

  2020cited by this paper
• Sunlight alone is not a disinfectant: Consent and the futility of opening Big Data black boxes (without assistance)

  2020cited by this paper
• Facial feature discovery for ethnicity recognition

  2019cited by this paper
• The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

  2019cited by this paper
• Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

  2019cited by this paper
• Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction

  2019cited by this paper
• Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study

  2019cited by this paper
• Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems

  2018cited by this paper
• Scalable Private Learning with PATE

  2018cited by this paper
• Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making

  2018cited by this paper
• Datasheets for datasets

  2018cited by this paper
• Data Statements for Natural Language Processing: Toward Mitigating System Bias and Enabling Better Science

  2018cited by this paper
• Model Cards for Model Reporting

  2018cited by this paper
• ORIGIN PRIVACY – PROTECTING PRIVACY IN THE BIG-DATA

  2018cited by this paper
• Improving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?

  2018influential reference
• “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics

  2018cited by this paper
• Eliciting Values Reflections by Engaging Privacy Futures Using Design Workbooks

  2017cited by this paper
• A Stitch in Time: Supporting Android Developers in WritingSecure Code

  2017cited by this paper
• Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models

  2016cited by this paper
• The Social and Economic Implications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Near-Term

  2016cited by this paper
• You are Not Your Developer, Either: A Research Agenda for Usable Security and Privacy Research Beyond End Users

  2016cited by this paper
• Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks: An Integrated Perspective of Privacy Invasion and Relationship Bonding

  2015cited by this paper
• Social influences on secure development tool adoption: why security tools spread

  2014cited by this paper
• Us and them: a study of privacy requirements across north america, asia, and europe

  2014cited by this paper
• Using Ethical-Response Surveys to Identify Sources of Disapproval and Concern with Facebook's Emotional Contagion Experiment and Other Controversial Studies

  2014cited by this paper
• Big data's end run around procedural privacy protections

  2014cited by this paper
• The Privacy and Security Behaviors of Smartphone App Developers

  2014cited by this paper
• Why don't software developers use static analysis tools to find bugs?

  2013cited by this paper
• Why do programmers make security errors?

  2011cited by this paper
• Security in the Wild

  2011cited by this paper
• Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis

  2006cited by this paper
• Privacy as contextual integrity

  2004influential reference
• Security in the wild: user strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem

  2004cited by this paper
• Basics of Qualitative Research

  1992cited by this paper
• A Taxonomy for Privacy

  1981influential reference

• How Well Can LLM Agents Simulate End-User Security and Privacy Attitudes and Behaviors?

  2026cites this paper
• "We are not Future-ready": Understanding AI Privacy Risks and Existing Mitigation Strategies from the Perspective of AI Developers in Europe

  2025cites this paper
• SoK: Synthesizing Smart Home Privacy Protection Mechanisms Across Academic Proposals and Commercial Documentations

  2025cites this paper
• Privacy Bills of Materials: A Transparent Privacy Information Inventory for Collaborative Privacy Notice Generation in Mobile App Development

  2025influential citation
• AI Mismatches: Identifying Potential Algorithmic Harms Before AI Development

  2025cites this paper
• Understanding Users' Security and Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Towards Conversational AI Platforms

  2025cites this paper
• Making the Right Thing: Bridging HCI and Responsible AI in Early-Stage AI Concept Selection

  2025cites this paper
• Supporting the Integration of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies into the Software Development Life Cycle

  2025cites this paper
• "I Always Felt that SomethingWasWrong.": Understanding Compliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies when Highly-Skilled Compliance Knowledge Workers Use Large Language Models

  2024cites this paper
• Power and Play: Investigating "License to Critique" in Teams' AI Ethics Discussions

  2024cites this paper
• "I Always Felt that Something Was Wrong.": Understanding Compliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies when Professionals Use Large Language Models

  2024cites this paper
• Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A Taxonomy of AI Privacy Risks

  2023cites this paper
• Privacy, Policy, and Compliance in Yet Another ‘Age’: The Necessity of Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Artificial Intelligence Applications

  year unknowncites this paper