Monitoring in Biodiversity Offsetting

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  Global Ecology and Conservation

• Publication date

  2024-06-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03039
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Credible biodiversity offsetting needs public national registers to confirm no net loss

  2022cited by this paper
• Operationalisation of ecological compensation - Obstacles and ways forward.

  2022cited by this paper
• Compensating for lost nature values through biodiversity offsetting – Where is the evidence?

  2021cited by this paper
• Governing for “no net loss” of biodiversity over the long term: challenges and pathways forward

  2021cited by this paper
• When is an Offset Not an Offset? A Framework of Necessary Conditions for Biodiversity Offsets

  2021cited by this paper
• Comparison of staircase and asymmetrical before–after, control–impact (aBACI) experimental designs to test the effectiveness of stream restoration at increasing juvenile steelhead density

  2021cited by this paper
• Improving averted loss estimates for better biodiversity outcomes from offset exchanges

  2020cited by this paper
• Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences

  2020cited by this paper
• Quantifying the impact of vegetation‐based metrics on species persistence when choosing offsets for habitat destruction

  2020cited by this paper
• Improving scientific rigour in conservation evaluations and a plea deal for transparency on potential biases

  2020cited by this paper
• Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets

  2020cited by this paper
• What are we measuring? A review of metrics used to describe biodiversity in offsets exchanges

  2020cited by this paper
• Biodiversity Offset Program Design and Implementation

  2019cited by this paper
• Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database

  2019cited by this paper
• Do biodiversity offsets achieve No Net Loss? An evaluation of offsets in a French department

  2019cited by this paper
• Challenges of achieving biodiversity offset outcomes through agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from an empirical study in Southern France

  2019cited by this paper
• Compliance with and ecosystem function of biodiversity offsets in North American and European freshwaters

  2019cited by this paper
• Expert predictions of changes in vegetation condition reveal perceived risks in biodiversity offsetting

  2019cited by this paper
• The Role of “No Net Loss” Policies in Conserving Biodiversity Threatened by the Global Infrastructure Boom

  2019cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of biodiversity offsets: An assessment of a controversial offset in Perth, Western Australia

  2018cited by this paper
• Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success

  2018cited by this paper
• Policy flaws of biodiversity offsetting as a conservation strategy

  2018cited by this paper
• Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

  2018cited by this paper
• The many meanings of no net loss in environmental policy

  2018cited by this paper
• Fifteen operationally important decisions in the planning of biodiversity offsets

  2018cited by this paper
• The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services

  2018cited by this paper
• A quantitative framework for evaluating the impact of biodiversity offset policies

  2018cited by this paper
• Biodiversity offsets in South Africa – challenges and potential solutions

  2017cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of vegetation‐based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants

  2017cited by this paper
• Building capacity in biodiversity monitoring at the global scale

  2017cited by this paper
• Thirty years of species conservation banking in the U.S.: Comparing policy to practice

  2017cited by this paper
• The anatomy of a failed offset

  2017cited by this paper
• Are offsets effective? An evaluation of recent environmental offsets in Western Australia

  2017cited by this paper
• Quasi-experimental methods enable stronger inferences from observational data in ecology

  2017cited by this paper
• Should We Be Wary of Mitigation Banking? Evidence Regarding the Risks Associated with this Wetland Offset Arrangement in Florida

  2017cited by this paper
• Inefficacy of wetland legislation for conserving Quebec wetlands as revealed by mapping of recent disturbances

  2016cited by this paper
• Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

  2016cited by this paper
• Systematic site selection for multispecies monitoring networks

  2016cited by this paper
• FORUM: Perverse incentives risk undermining biodiversity offset policies

  2015cited by this paper
• Bulldozing biodiversity: The economics of offsets and trading-in Nature

  2015cited by this paper
• Compensatory Mitigation Performance: The State of the Science

  2015cited by this paper
• Developing an offsetting programme: tensions, dilemmas and difficulties in biodiversity market-making in England

  2015cited by this paper
• The ethics of offsetting nature

  2015cited by this paper
• A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity

  2014cited by this paper
• Importance of Baseline Specification in Evaluating Conservation Interventions and Achieving No Net Loss of Biodiversity

  2014cited by this paper
• Is restoring flora the same as restoring fauna? Lessons learned from koalas and mining rehabilitation

  2013cited by this paper
• Bureaucratic Slippage and Environmental Offset Policies: The Case of Wetland Management in Alberta

  2013cited by this paper
• Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice

  2013cited by this paper
• Ecological compensation: an evaluation of regulatory compliance in New Zealand

  2013cited by this paper
• Compensatory Mitigation in Marine Ecosystems: Which Indicators for Assessing the "No Net Loss" Goal of Ecosystem Services and Ecological Functions?

  2012cited by this paper
• Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies

  2012cited by this paper
• Toward an Era of Restoration in Ecology: Successes, Failures, and Opportunities Ahead

  2011cited by this paper
• Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment

  2011cited by this paper
• Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks

  2010cited by this paper
• Why bartering biodiversity fails

  2009cited by this paper
• Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy

  2009cited by this paper
• Evaluating Restoration Success of Frequently Implemented Compensation Measures: Results and Demands for Control Procedures

  2008cited by this paper
• Integrating ongoing biodiversity monitoring: potential benefits and methods

  2008cited by this paper
• Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes

  2008cited by this paper
• Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog?

  2007cited by this paper
• Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time.

  2006cited by this paper
• Compliance with Canada’s Fisheries Act: A Field Audit of Habitat Compensation Projects

  2006cited by this paper
• Hopes for the Future: Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology

  1997cited by this paper
• Switzerland

  1989cited by this paper

• Five rules for scientifically credible nature markets

  2026cites this paper
• Defining ecologically realistic biodiversity offset multipliers with the Response-based Habitat Hectare Assessment of Biodiversity Gains (REHAB)

  2026influential citation