Application and attitudes: active restoration in the context of biodiversity offsetting

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  Restoration Ecology

• Publication date

  2024-07-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/rec.14149
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Soil carbon sequestration benefits of active versus natural restoration vary with initial carbon content and soil layer

  2023cited by this paper
• Landholder perceptions of biodiversity offsetting rights and responsibilities: implications for policy reform in New South Wales, Australia

  2023cited by this paper
• A global overview of biodiversity offsetting governance.

  2022cited by this paper
• Guidelines for selecting an appropriate currency in biodiversity offset transactions.

  2022cited by this paper
• Social impacts of biodiversity offsetting: A review

  2022cited by this paper
• “Splitting the bill” for conservation: Perceptions and uptake of financial incentives by landholders managing privately protected areas

  2022cited by this paper
• A new Vegetation Integrity metric for trading losses and gains in terrestrial biodiversity value

  2021cited by this paper
• Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review.

  2021cited by this paper
• Australian native seed sector characteristics and perceptions indicate low capacity for upscaled ecological restoration: insights from the Australian Native Seed Report

  2021cited by this paper
• Distributive and contextual equity in landholder participation in biodiversity offsets: a case study of biodiversity offsets in New South Wales, Australia

  2021cited by this paper
• Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration

  2021cited by this paper
• Active restoration fosters better recovery of tropical rainforest birds than natural regeneration in degraded forest fragments

  2021cited by this paper
• Prediction and uncertainty in restoration science

  2021cited by this paper
• Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration

  2020cited by this paper
• Ethics and biodiversity offsetting

  2020cited by this paper
• Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets

  2020cited by this paper
• Multivariate Data Analysis: Its Approach, Evolution, and Impact

  2019influential reference
• Should I plant or should I sow? Restoration outcomes compared across seven riparian revegetation projects

  2019cited by this paper
• Biodiversity offsetting: Certainty of the net loss but uncertainty of the net gain

  2019cited by this paper
• Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems

  2018cited by this paper
• Conclusions: Lessons from Biodiversity Offsetting Experiences in Europe

  2018cited by this paper
• The many meanings of no net loss in environmental policy

  2018cited by this paper
• Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting

  2018cited by this paper
• The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies

  2018cited by this paper
• What motivates ecological restoration?

  2017cited by this paper
• Some dimension reduction strategies for the analysis of survey data

  2017cited by this paper
• The sweet and the bitter: Intertwined positive and negative social impacts of a biodiversity offset

  2017cited by this paper
• A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery

  2017cited by this paper
• Environmental impact assessment: Maddox Creek culvert removal and habitat restoration project

  2017cited by this paper
• A Loss‐Gain Calculator for Biodiversity Offsets and the Circumstances in Which No Net Loss Is Feasible

  2016cited by this paper
• What's wrong with novel ecosystems, really?

  2016cited by this paper
• Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

  2016cited by this paper
• Compensating environmental losses versus creating environmental gains Implications for biodiversity offsets and agri-environmental contracts

  2016cited by this paper
• Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management

  2016cited by this paper
• Likert Scale: Explored and Explained

  2015cited by this paper
• Measuring the difference made by conservation initiatives: protected areas and their environmental and social impacts

  2015cited by this paper
• Identifying Challenges to Building an Evidence Base for Restoration Practice

  2015cited by this paper
• The socioecological complexity of ecological restoration in Mexico

  2015cited by this paper
• Locking in loss: Baselines of decline in Australian biodiversity offset policies

  2015cited by this paper
• Nets and frames, losses and gains: Value struggles in engagements with biodiversity offsetting policy in England

  2015cited by this paper
• A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity

  2014cited by this paper
• Seed availability for restoration

  2014cited by this paper
• R: A language and environment for statistical computing.

  2014influential reference
• Do We Practice What We Preach? Goal Setting for Ecological Restoration

  2013cited by this paper
• Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies

  2012cited by this paper
• Offsetting Nature? Habitat Banking and Biodiversity Offsets in the English Land Use Planning System

  2012cited by this paper
• MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R

  2011cited by this paper
• Toward an Era of Restoration in Ecology: Successes, Failures, and Opportunities Ahead

  2011cited by this paper
• When and where to actively restore ecosystems

  2011cited by this paper
• Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis

  2009cited by this paper
• Why bartering biodiversity fails

  2009cited by this paper
• The Challenge to Restore Processes in Face of Nonlinear Dynamics—On the Crucial Role of Disturbance Regimes

  2007cited by this paper
• Habitat Restoration—Do We Know What We’re Doing?

  2007cited by this paper
• Stretch Goals and Backcasting: Approaches for Overcoming Barriers to Large‐Scale Ecological Restoration

  2006cited by this paper
• The Adirondacks Demonstrate the Restoration Thesis

  2005cited by this paper
• AN OVERVIEW OF MULTIPLE IMPUTATION

  2002cited by this paper
• SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parimonious model testing for management development research

  2001cited by this paper
• Statistical Analysis With Missing Data

  1988cited by this paper
• Department of Economics and Finance Working Paper Series @bullet Estimating Missing Values from the General Social Survey: an Application of Multiple Imputation

  year unknowncited by this paper

• M(any) takers? Orienting adaptive management to address enrolment uncertainties in private land conservation

  2026cites this paper
• ‘Should’ and ‘can’ active restoration be used in biodiversity offsets? Stakeholder perspectives from New South Wales, Australia

  2025cites this paper
• Five years of offsetting native vegetation: The challenge of achieving no-net-loss

  2025cites this paper
• Biodiversity offset conditions contributing to net loss of koala Phascolarctos cinereus habitat

  2024cites this paper