Moral hypocrisy and the dichotomy of hypothetical versus real choices in prosocial behavior

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  Journal of Economic Psychology

• Publication date

  2024-10-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2024.102772
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Taking games: a meta-analysis

  2024cited by this paper
• Stereotypical behavior vs. expectations: Gender differences in a dictator game

  2024cited by this paper
• Sharing losses in dictator and ultimatum games: A meta-analysis✩

  2024cited by this paper
• Do prosocial incentives motivate women to set higher goals and improve performance?

  2023cited by this paper
• Locus of control and other-regarding behavior: Experimental evidence from a large heterogeneous sample

  2023cited by this paper
• High Incentives without High Cost - The Role of (Perceived) Stake Sizes in Dictator Games

  2022cited by this paper
• Lying behavior when payoffs are shared with charity: Experimental evidence

  2022cited by this paper
• Collaborative dishonesty: A meta-analytic review.

  2021cited by this paper
• Generous with individuals and selfish to the masses

  2021cited by this paper
• Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?

  2021cited by this paper
• Thou shalt not steal: Taking aversion with legal property claims

  2019cited by this paper
• The Truth About Lies: A Meta-Analysis on Dishonest Behavior

  2019cited by this paper
• No gain without pain: The psychological costs of dishonesty

  2019cited by this paper
• On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study

  2018cited by this paper
• Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature

  2018cited by this paper
• Gender Differences in the Giving and Taking Variants of the Dictator Game

  2017cited by this paper
• Old age and prosocial behavior: Social preferences or experimental confounds?☆

  2016cited by this paper
• Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games

  2016cited by this paper
• Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.

  2015cited by this paper
• The Role of Interpersonal Traits in Social Decision Making

  2015cited by this paper
• The Effect of $1, $5 and $10 Stakes in an Online Dictator Game

  2013cited by this paper
• Explaining differences in real and hypothetical experimental auctions and choice experiments with personality

  2013cited by this paper
• Real and hypothetical endowment effects when exchanging lottery tickets: Is regret a better explanation than loss aversion?

  2013cited by this paper
• How different are real and hypothetical decisions? Overestimation, contrast and assimilation in social interaction

  2012cited by this paper
• What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices

  2012cited by this paper
• Paying to Be Nice: Consistency and Costly Prosocial Behavior

  2011cited by this paper
• Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects

  2009cited by this paper
• On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games

  2007cited by this paper
• What you don't know won't hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games

  2006cited by this paper
• ‘Doing Business After the Fall: The Virtue of Moral Hypocrisy’

  2006cited by this paper
• Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/bdm.492 The ‘‘Identified Victim’ ’ Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a

  2005cited by this paper
• UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS

  2001cited by this paper
• What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?

  2001cited by this paper
• ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition

  2000cited by this paper
• Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect

  1997cited by this paper

• Purely hedonic image concerns and audience size: Evidence from a charity dictator game

  2025cites this paper
• Leaving Money on the Table

  2025cites this paper
• When Fast Thinking Meets Bad Emotion: The Effect of Intuitive Processing Modes and Negative Moods on Moral Hypocrisy

  2025cites this paper