Planting native trees in degraded grassy woodland does not restore species composition

Restoration of degraded former Cumberland Plain Woodland by planting of native trees and shrubs was undertaken by Greening Australia (NSW) on the Cumberland Plain, west of Sydney, Australia, from the mid‐1990s. Our study examined the success of this restoration in stands of two ages using species composition as the criterion. The starting point (pasture) and the target (reference woodland) were sampled to document the extent of progress of species composition from pasture through young (3–5 years) and old (9–11 years) restoration stands to reference woodland across three sites at two surveys. Comparisons showed restored stands of both ages differed significantly from pasture, and from each other, showing decreasing similarity between the restoration stands and pasture at all sites. Despite this, species composition in restored stands at all three sites was still significantly different from reference sites, showing that none had achieved the target reference state after 11 years. The trajectory of restored sites between the two surveys was not towards the reference state. Restoration resulted in the establishment of 20 (71%) of the planted species. Recruits from five planted species were found. A further 40 unplanted native ground layer species were found in restoration. Structurally, tree cover increased with time since restoration and was higher in the restored sites. Ground cover, which was very high in pasture was lower in some restored sites. The majority of the unplanted native species were resprouters, and their presence in the above‐ground vegetation was most likely by vegetative resprouting from the bud‐and‐tuber bank as ground cover was lower with the increase in tree cover and shade. Tree and shrub planting by itself has not yet progressed the restored areas to the species composition of reference sites. Additional tools will be needed to assist restoration, specifically the addition of re‐seeder native plants not able to persist through vegetative resprouting after restoration. Measures to control the burden of weeds present in the pasture seed bank are also required.

• Publication year

  2024

• Venue

  Ecological Management & Restoration

• Publication date

  2024-10-27

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/emr.12619
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Germinable soil seed bank of pasture, revegetation and remnant Cumberland Plain Woodland

  2023cited by this paper
• Effects of fire frequency and microhabitat on the ground layer in a grassy woodland

  2020cited by this paper
• Limited evidence of compositional convergence of restored vegetation with reference states after 20 years of livestock exclusion

  2019cited by this paper
• A primer on choosing goals and indicators to evaluate ecological restoration success

  2019cited by this paper
• Multivariate drivers of diversity in temperate Australian native grasslands

  2019cited by this paper
• Towards a population approach for evaluating grassland restoration—a systematic review

  2018cited by this paper
• Effects of drought and fire on resprouting capacity of 52 temperate Australian perennial native grasses.

  2018cited by this paper
• Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests

  2017cited by this paper
• A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery

  2017cited by this paper
• Trajectories of floristic change in grassland: landscape, land use legacy and seasonal conditions overshadow restoration actions

  2017cited by this paper
• Ecosystem risk assessment for Cumberland Plain Woodland, New South Wales, Australia

  2015cited by this paper
• Resprouting as a key functional trait: how buds, protection and resources drive persistence after fire.

  2013cited by this paper
• Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature

  2013cited by this paper
• Ecological and anthropomorphic factors permitting low-risk assisted colonization in temperate grassy woodlands

  2011cited by this paper
• Testing a facilitation model for ecosystem restoration : does tree planting restore ground layer species in a grassy woodland?

  2010cited by this paper
• Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress.

  2009cited by this paper
• Regeneration of native plant species in restored forests on degraded lands in Singapore

  2006cited by this paper
• Restoration Success: How Is It Being Measured?

  2005cited by this paper
• Measuring Success: Evaluating the Restoration of a Grassy Eucalypt Woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, Australia

  2003cited by this paper
• Rehabilitating Western Sydney’s bushland: Processes needed for sustained recovery

  2001cited by this paper
• Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche.

  2001cited by this paper
• Germinable soil seed banks of anthropogenic native grasslands and grassy forest remnants in temperate south-eastern Australia

  1997cited by this paper
• Fire-driven extinction of plant populations: A synthesis of theory and review of evidence from Australian vegetation

  1996cited by this paper
• International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.