Arthropods face a global decline attributed to habitat loss, climate change, pesticide use, and an intensification of land‐use practices such as mowing. Studies on the effects of mowing on arthropod abundance showed conflicting results potentially due to multiple factors, including study design, grassland management, sampling method, and arthropod taxon studied. We conducted four studies in different grasslands, including intensively and extensively used agricultural and urban grasslands, utilising sweep netting, suction sampling, and pitfall traps. We compared the mowing responses of arthropod taxa between those studies at three different taxonomic resolutions (first‐level overall arthropods, second‐level orders, and third‐level families and suborders). First, we discovered that mowing had a negative effect on overall arthropod abundance in all our studies (first level). Second, our four studies found that seven second‐ and third‐level taxa showed only negative, four only positive, and four mixed positive and negative responses. Third, regarding taxonomic resolution, no third‐level taxon reacted differently to mowing compared to the second‐level taxon it belongs to. Our results indicate that for some taxa, mowing has a consistent negative (e.g. Diptera) or positive effects (e.g. Coleoptera). We suggest those groups have uniform phenological traits that make them especially vulnerable to mowing. For taxa showing mixed responses, we expect that study‐dependent factors such as region, sampling method, and grassland management affect their response to mowing.
Differential effect of grassland mowing on arthropod taxa
Robert Künast,W. Weisser,S. Seibold,David Mayr,Nils Siegmüller,I. Schneider,Martin Westenrieder,N. Blüthgen,Michael Staab,Sebastian T. Meyer,R. Achury
Published 2024 in Ecological Entomology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2024
- Venue
Ecological Entomology
- Publication date
2024-11-18
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-53 of 53 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-2 of 2 citing papers · Page 1 of 1