Lipid goal attainment remains suboptimal due to patient, provider, and system level factors. We aimed to assess whether updated, guideline-based lipid reporting and clinical decision support was associated with different lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) prescription patterns. We conducted a retrospective study in our electronic health record (EHR) comparing prescriptions within 90 days of lab reporting both prior to the reporting change (21,417 patients in 2019-2020) and after (39,866 patients in 2020-2021). We found a significant increase in the initiation of LLT in patients > 40 years of age with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL, with 2377 (11.6%) initiated prior to compared to 6205 (16.3%) after the reporting change (P < .001). Among 4469 adult patients with ASCVD and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL prior to (n = 2040) and after (n = 3277) the reporting change, there was a significantly higher rate of LLT initiation, 444 (25.9%) prior to vs 875 (31.8%) after; P < .001. In conclusion, after implementation of updated guideline-based lipid test reporting, we observed higher initiation rates of LLT for indicated patients. Our study suggests that guideline-based reporting of lipid test results may aid in guideline implementation.
Implementation of guideline-based lipid reporting and rate of lipid lowering therapy prescription.
Anish Adhikari,Aya Haghamad,Xueqi Huang,Joanna Fishbein,Georgeta D Vaidean,Jamie S. Hirsch,J. M. Crawford,Maya Rubin,Monique Carrero-Tagle,Eugenia Gianos
Published 2024 in Journal of Clinical Lipidology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2024
- Venue
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
- Publication date
2024-12-01
- Fields of study
Medicine
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-15 of 15 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-2 of 2 citing papers · Page 1 of 1