Agendas and instability in American local politics: A study of the Austin City Council Agenda 1900–2020

The 1993 publication of Agendas and Instability in American Politics transformed the study of policymaking in American politics, by systematically tracing stability and change in issue attention over time. The underlying data collection effort is essential to understanding its importance; thousands of measures of the policy agenda were collected and content coded to examine trends in policy outputs from various American political institutions. In this study, we apply a similar coding scheme at the local level to study stability and change in policy agendas at the local level. Using a 120‐year sample of all items from city council meeting minutes in Austin, Texas, content coded to the subtopic level, we identify long‐term trends in the local policy agenda and explores how the local policy agenda is influenced by the national policy agenda, by local population growth and by reforms of local political institutions.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Policy Studies Journal

• Publication date

  2025-01-10

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/psj.12587
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics

  2023cited by this paper
• Explaining Local Policy Agendas

  2022cited by this paper
• Can Institutional Reform Have a Lasting Impact on the Policy Agenda? Evidence From the 10-1 in Austin, TX

  2021cited by this paper
• The Great Broadening: How the Vast Expansion of the Policymaking Agenda Transformed American Politics. By Bryan D. Jones, Sean M. Theriault, and Michelle Whyman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. 328p. $97.50 cloth, $32.50 paper.

  2021influential reference
• Comparing agenda-settings: the Comparative Agendas Project

  2020cited by this paper
• The Great Broadening

  2019influential reference
• Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes

  2018cited by this paper
• The Bureaucracy and the Policy Agenda

  2018cited by this paper
• Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries

  2016cited by this paper
• Local government agenda setting

  2016cited by this paper
• Shadows of a Sunbelt City: The Environment, Racism, and the Knowledge Economy in Austin

  2016cited by this paper
• THE POLITICS OF INFORMATION: PROBLEM DEFINITION AND THE COURSE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN AMERICA

  2016cited by this paper
• Why Are Some Policy Agendas Larger than Others

  2016cited by this paper
• Agenda Dynamics in Spain

  2015cited by this paper
• Preferences, Problems and Representation

  2015cited by this paper
• The Importance of Attention Diversity and How to Measure It

  2014influential reference
• Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics

  2014cited by this paper
• Taking Time Seriously

  2014cited by this paper
• Agenda setting, policies, and political systems : a comparative approach

  2014cited by this paper
• Size and Local Democracy

  2014cited by this paper
• New Avenues for the Study of Agenda Setting

  2014cited by this paper
• Policy Agendas in British Politics

  2013cited by this paper
• Agendas and Instability in American Politics

  2013influential reference
• The Policy Agenda and British Politics

  2013cited by this paper
• Local Government in Europe : The ‘Fourth Level’ in the EU Multi-Layered System of Governance

  2013cited by this paper
• Setting City Agendas:: Power and Policy Change

  2012cited by this paper
• Agenda Setting in the States: How Politics and Policy Needs Shape Gubernatorial Agendas

  2012cited by this paper
• Comparing Government Agendas

  2011cited by this paper
• Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics

  2011cited by this paper
• Policy Attention in State and Nation: Is Anyone Listening to the Laboratories of Democracy?

  2011cited by this paper
• Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies

  2010cited by this paper
• "Sanctuary Cities" and Local Citizenship

  2010cited by this paper
• A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: A Comparative Analysis

  2009cited by this paper
• The Impact of Scale

  2009cited by this paper
• Why study urban politics

  2009cited by this paper
• The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems

  2008cited by this paper
• Taking Time Seriously

  2008cited by this paper
• Expanding Homes and Increasing Inequalities: U.S. Housing Development and the Residential Segregation of the Affluent

  2007cited by this paper
• Is Urban Politics a Black Hole? Analyzing the Boundary Between Political Science and Urban Politics

  2007cited by this paper
• Structure and Opportunity: Committee Jurisdiction and Issue Attention in Congress

  2006cited by this paper
• City limits

  2005cited by this paper
• Disagreement and Consensus: The Need for Dynamic Updating in Public Deliberation

  2005cited by this paper
• Punctuations and agendas: A new look at local government budget expenditures

  2003cited by this paper
• The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions

  2000cited by this paper
• CAPACITY, DIVERSITY, AND VOLATILITY OF THE PUBLIC AGENDA TRENDS FROM 1954 TO 1994

  1995cited by this paper
• Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States

  1994cited by this paper
• Toward A General Theory Of Hierarchy: Books, Bureaucrats, Basketball Tournaments, And The Administrative Structure Of The Nation-State

  1993cited by this paper
• Progrowth Politics: Change and Governance in Houston. By Robert D. Thomas and Richard W. Murray. Franklin K. Lane Series on Governance in Metropolitan Areas, Vol. 9. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press, 1991. 428p. $19.95 paper.

  1993cited by this paper
• The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress

  1993cited by this paper
• Gubernatorial leadership and state policy

  1992cited by this paper
• Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988.

  1990cited by this paper
• Is Small Really So Beautiful? Is Big Really So Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government

  1982cited by this paper
• Agenda Setting

  1980cited by this paper
• Economic Growth and Neighborhood Discontent: System Bias in the Urban Renewal Program of Atlanta

  1976cited by this paper
• Size and Democracy

  1974cited by this paper
• The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities

  1972cited by this paper
• The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations

  1964cited by this paper
• A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures

  1956cited by this paper
• Community Power Structure. A Study of Decision Makers

  1954cited by this paper
• T he American Political Science Review THE CITY IN THE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY*

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.