Divided by morality? Moral foundations of affective polarisation during hard times

In this article, we examine the deeper causes of a key group conflict during the COVID-19 pandemic: attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccination. Extending research on affective polarisation beyond partisanship, we analyse how people perceive the external groups of vaccination supporters and opponents. Furthermore, we investigate how their own moral foundations influence these perceptions. Using six samples from six European countries, our analyses reveal an affective divide between supporters and opponents of COVID-19 vaccinations. Most interestingly and contrary to conventional expectations, we find that individualising rather than binding foundations intensify affective polarisation between pro- and anti-vaccination supporters in all countries. It seems that especially in times of pandemic threat, COVID-19 vaccination supporters and opponents alike feel that their core moral foundations, in particular, fairness are being challenged by their respective out-groups. Our findings could be used to develop depolarisation interventions involving moral framing.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Politics

• Publication date

  2025-02-13

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/02633957251315046
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Asymmetric affective polarization regarding COVID-19 vaccination in six European countries

  2024influential reference
• Divided by the jab: affective polarisation based on COVID vaccination status

  2024cited by this paper
• Affective Polarization Between Opinion-Based Groups in a Context of Low Partisan Discord: Measuring Its Prevalence and Consequences

  2024cited by this paper
• Threats, Emotions, and Affective Polarization

  2023cited by this paper
• Historical narratives about the COVID-19 pandemic are motivationally biased

  2023influential reference
• Is Affective Polarization Driven by Identity, Loyalty, or Substance?

  2023cited by this paper
• Public support for unequal treatment of unvaccinated citizens: Evidence from Denmark

  2022cited by this paper
• Moral Foundations Predict COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Evidence from a National Survey of Black Americans

  2022influential reference
• Discriminatory attitudes against unvaccinated people during the pandemic

  2022influential reference
• The association between vaccination status identification and societal polarization

  2022influential reference
• The impact of emotions on polarization. Anger polarizes attitudes towards vaccine mandates and increases affective polarization

  2022cited by this paper
• Pandemic Politics

  2022cited by this paper
• Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings

  2021cited by this paper
• The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity

  2021cited by this paper
• Considering Emotion in COVID-19 Vaccine Communication: Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy and Fostering Vaccine Confidence

  2020cited by this paper
• Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization

  2020cited by this paper
• Faith in Trump, Moral Foundations, and Social Distancing Defiance during the Coronavirus Pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

  2020cited by this paper
• The integration of emergency language services in COVID-19 response: a call for the linguistic turn in public health

  2020cited by this paper
• Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum

  2020influential reference
• Vaccination as a social contract

  2020cited by this paper
• American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

  2020cited by this paper
• A path model of psychosocial constructs predicting future Zika vaccine uptake intent.

  2019cited by this paper
• Moral polarization and out-party hostility in the US political context

  2019cited by this paper
• What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?

  2019cited by this paper
• Changing prosocial values following an existential threat as a function of political orientation: Understanding the effects of armed conflicts from a terror management perspective

  2019cited by this paper
• How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization

  2019influential reference
• The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization

  2018cited by this paper
• When the going gets tough, individualizers get going: On the relationship between moral foundations and prosociality

  2018cited by this paper
• Pluralistic morality and collective action: The role of moral foundations

  2018influential reference
• Moral foundations of positive and negative intergroup behavior: Moral exclusion fills the gap

  2018cited by this paper
• A behavioral economic assessment of individualizing versus binding moral foundations

  2017cited by this paper
• Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy

  2017cited by this paper
• Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity

  2015cited by this paper
• Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization

  2015cited by this paper
• “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization

  2015cited by this paper
• The Moral Ties That Bind . . . Even to Out-Groups: The Interactive Effect of Moral Identity and the Binding Moral Foundations

  2014cited by this paper
• Caring across Boundaries versus Keeping Boundaries Intact: Links between Moral Values and Interpersonal Orientations

  2013cited by this paper
• Moral psychology for the twenty-first century

  2013cited by this paper
• Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition

  2013influential reference
• Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization

  2012influential reference
• Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism

  2012influential reference
• Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes

  2012cited by this paper
• Moral Empathy Gaps and the American Culture War

  2011cited by this paper
• A Moral-Existential Account of the Psychological Factors Fostering Intergroup Conflict

  2011cited by this paper
• The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors

  2011cited by this paper
• From left to right: how the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations.

  2011cited by this paper
• Mapping the moral domain.

  2011influential reference
• Collective Action as the Material Expression of Opinion‐Based Group Membership

  2009influential reference
• Morality

  2008influential reference
• Mortality Salience Increases Adherence to Salient Norms and Values

  2008cited by this paper
• Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action

  2007cited by this paper
• The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.

  2004cited by this paper
• Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues

  2004cited by this paper
• The anxiety-buffering function of close relationships: evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism.

  2002cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.