Silent Voices or More than a Feeling? January 6th Insurrection and Racialized (Non)Attitudes

Abstract When do survey respondents choose to withhold feelings on questions related to polarizing and democratically important events such as the January 6th insurrection? While extant research has shown that “don’t know” responses or skipped questions in survey research function as a way to avoid expressing a socially undesirable opinion or feeling, no work has explored how nonresponses may be impacting our understanding of the American public’s support for the January 6th insurrection. Through analysis of the nonresponse answers within the 2022 Health of Democracy Survey, we show that a persistent pattern of item nonresponse was present among all racial groups asked to provide their feelings toward insurrectionists, and that women were significantly more likely to refuse sharing their feelings—warm or cold. Additionally, we find that although racialized feelings previously linked with support of the insurrection (racial resentment, racial affect, and white replacement theory) were not significantly related to January 6th item nonresponse, racial attitudes did hold an important relationship with January 6th item nonresponse among Non-Whites. Our results therefore highlight the importance of the intersection of race and gender in conversations about democratic norms, racial attitudes, and withholding views about highly politicized and polarizing events.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics

• Publication date

  2025-02-20

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/rep.2025.5
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The New Racial Spillover: Donald Trump, Racial Attitudes, and Public Opinion Toward Accountability for Perpetrators and Planners of the January 6 Capitol Attack

  2024influential reference
• Uncommon and nonpartisan: Antidemocratic attitudes in the American public

  2024influential reference
• Norm-violating rhetoric undermines support for participatory inclusiveness and political equality among Trump supporters

  2023cited by this paper
• Consequences of affective polarization: Avoidance, intolerance and support for violence in the United Kingdom and Norway

  2023cited by this paper
• Black Lives Matter and the Racialized Support for the January 6th Insurrection

  2023influential reference
• “Stop the Steal”: Racial Resentment, Affective Partisanship, and Investigating the January 6th Insurrection

  2023influential reference
• Racial resentment in the political mind

  2022cited by this paper
• The Prevalence and Implications of Gender Blindness in Quantitative Political Science Research

  2022cited by this paper
• The stigmatisation effect of the radical right on voters’ assessment of political proposals

  2022cited by this paper
• Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis

  2022cited by this paper
• Guy-Guessing Democracy: Gender and Item Non-Response Bias in Evaluations of Democratic Institutions

  2022influential reference
• How affective polarization undermines support for democratic norms

  2021cited by this paper
• A Discussion of Ismail K. White and Chryl N. Laird’s Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior

  2021cited by this paper
• Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms

  2021cited by this paper
• Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America

  2020cited by this paper
• Partisanship as a Social Identity: Implications for Polarization

  2020cited by this paper
• Political sectarianism in America

  2020cited by this paper
• American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

  2020cited by this paper
• The Variable Nature of the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge

  2020cited by this paper
• The gender gap in political interest revisited

  2019cited by this paper
• Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Third Edition

  2019influential reference
• The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

  2019cited by this paper
• Democratic Values and Institutions

  2019cited by this paper
• Gender and Democratic Attitudes: Do Women and Men Prioritize Different Democratic Institutions?

  2019cited by this paper
• How Democracies Die

  2019cited by this paper
• TRENDS: Racial Resentment and Public Opinion across the Racial Divide

  2019cited by this paper
• The Impact of Social Desirability Pressures on Whites’ Endorsement of Racial Stereotypes: A Comparison Between Oral and ACASI Reports in a National Survey

  2019cited by this paper
• Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity

  2018cited by this paper
• The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis

  2018cited by this paper
• The Twilight of the Polls? A Review of Trends in Polling Accuracy and the Causes of Polling Misses

  2018cited by this paper
• Who Knows More About Politics? A Dual Explanation for the Gender Gap

  2018cited by this paper
• The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It

  2018cited by this paper
• Election polling errors across time and space

  2018cited by this paper
• Are public opinion polls doomed?

  2018cited by this paper
• The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

  2016cited by this paper
• Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys

  2016influential reference
• Community development: key to reducing health inequalities.

  2013cited by this paper
• The Effect of Survey Mode on Socially Undesirable Responses to Open-ended Questions

  2013cited by this paper
• Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization

  2012cited by this paper
• Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies

  2012cited by this paper
• Race and Residence From the Telescope to the Microscope

  2011cited by this paper
• The Roots of the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge in Adolescence

  2011cited by this paper
• The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change

  2010cited by this paper
• Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

  2009cited by this paper
• Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology

  2008cited by this paper
• Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis

  2008cited by this paper
• Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour

  2008cited by this paper
• The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964)

  2006cited by this paper
• A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change

  2004cited by this paper
• Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America

  2004influential reference
• Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda

  2004cited by this paper
• The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same: Examining Gender Differences in Political Attitude Expression, 1952–2000

  2003cited by this paper
• Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain

  2003influential reference
• Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.

  2003cited by this paper
• Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data

  2002influential reference
• The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation

  2001cited by this paper
• Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems

  1997cited by this paper
• What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters

  1996cited by this paper
• Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.

  1994cited by this paper
• Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s

  1986cited by this paper
• The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion

  1974cited by this paper
• The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America

  1960cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.