From silos to joined-up government? Examining national climate policy integration in Ethiopia

ABSTRACT Climate change is a serious policy problem that seeks coordinated actions at many levels and throughout various policy subsystems. This study was conducted to examine the progress in the national Climate Policy Integration (CPI) process and barriers in Ethiopia. The empirical analysis unpacks existing and emerging cross-sectoral governance structures since the Climate Resilience Green Economy (CRGE) was adopted in 2011. The CPI analysis is pertinent given that coordinating policy subsystems is highly uncertain as challenges exist in reforming silo institutional cultures and policy monopolies. The study approached CPI as a process determined by policy framing, climate goals, policy instrument mix, and subsystem involvement. Methodologically, the study was conducted as a qualitative case study. Empirical data were collected from content analysis of policy documents and eighteen semi-structured interviews with purposefully selected key informants. The result from empirical analysis reveals progress toward CPI guided by a cross-sectoral policy frame, the inclusion of climate goals based on economic co-benefits, and deploying an incremental mix of policy instruments. Nonetheless, the long-term CPI process is hindered by the unstable governing structures, particularly the frequent restructuring of the environmental ministry and lack of adequate climate finance which all reinstate sectoral silos and path dependence. Key policy insights Long-term coordination of cross-sectoral climate policy integration tends to be precarious. Climate policy integration requires a stable cross-sectoral governance structure and clear sectoral mandates. The presence of pressing economic development priorities prohibits policymakers from pursuing a principled priority for climate policy goals. Coordinated information sharing among policy actors could augment policy integration and tackle duplications and inconsistencies.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Climate Policy

• Publication date

  2025-03-24

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/14693062.2025.2479809
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Climate policy integration as a process: from shallow to embedded integration

  2024cited by this paper
• Climate discourses as barriers to rights-based adaptive social protection: How historical politics shape Ethiopia’s climate-smart safety net

  2022cited by this paper
• Varieties of climate governance: the emergence and functioning of climate institutions

  2021cited by this paper
• Instruments for Policy Integration: How Policy Mixes Work Together

  2021cited by this paper
• Germany’s Federal Climate Change Act

  2021cited by this paper
• Climate mainstreaming via national climate funds: the experiences of Bangladesh and Ethiopia

  2021cited by this paper
• Policy integration and climate change adaptation

  2021influential reference
• Reframing Policy Discourse

  2020cited by this paper
• The expediency of policy integration

  2019cited by this paper
• Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands

  2019cited by this paper
• Policy integration: mapping the different concepts

  2017cited by this paper
• Moving Policy Theory Forward: Connecting Multiple Stream and Advocacy Coalition Frameworks to Policy Cycle Models of Analysis

  2017cited by this paper
• Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration

  2017cited by this paper
• Toward a processual understanding of policy integration

  2016influential reference
• The two orders of governance failure: Design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance

  2014cited by this paper
• Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy Strategy

  2013influential reference
• Rigour in qualitative case-study research.

  2013cited by this paper
• Exploring Political and Socio-Economic Drivers of Transformational Climate Policy: Early Insights from the Design of Ethiopia's Climate Resilient Green Economy Strategy

  2013cited by this paper
• Designing Case Studies

  2012cited by this paper
• Combating complexity: the integration of EU climate and energy policies*

  2011cited by this paper
• A Typology for the Case Study in Social Science Following a Review of Definition, Discourse, and Structure

  2011cited by this paper
• Strategies to Take Subjectivity Out of Framing Analysis

  2010cited by this paper
• Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution

  2009cited by this paper
• Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review

  2004cited by this paper
• The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research

  2003cited by this paper
• Decentralization, the New Public Management, and The Changing Role of The Public Sector In Africa

  2000cited by this paper
• Games Real Actors Could Play

  1994cited by this paper
• Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory

  1988cited by this paper
• Integrated marine policy: What? Why? How?☆

  1980cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.