This study aims to understand how married couples agree or disagree on gender ideologies, as well as what sociodemographic characteristics are related to these pairings.Past studies have explored the multidimensional nature of gender ideologies within individuals; however, this multidimensionality at the couple level is less understood. Although some research suggests couples will largely agree on gender ideologies, other theories imply that women in different‐sex couples will be more gender progressive than their partners.Using data from 1290 different‐sex couples married mostly in 2014 who participated in a nationally representative study in the United States, the authors identified latent classes of partners' gender ideologies using several measures. The authors then examined how latent class membership varied by sociodemographic characteristics using multinomial regression.Results showed five underlying latent classes: Moderate (30%), Strongly Egalitarian (20%), Nuanced Traditional (20%), Mixed (18%), and Neutral (12%). About 82% of couples in the sample consisted of two partners who shared similar views. Results showed high levels of non‐extreme stances. About 42% of couples belonged in either a Neutral class—neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the gender ideology measures—or a Moderate class. Several sociodemographic characteristics significantly predicted class membership.Findings provide support for assortative mating—people tend to agree with their spouse on gender ideologies. Further, the findings show that although some individuals stuck “in the middle” between traditionalism and egalitarianism adopt moderate views, others seemingly adopt what the authors title firm equivocation.
What is your type? Latent classes of newly married couples' gender ideologies
A. Gibby,Jane Lankes Smith,Jeremy B. Yorgason,Aubrey Bardsley,Erin K. Holmes,Spencer L. James
Published 2025 in Journal of Marriage and Family
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publication date
2025-03-29
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-48 of 48 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1