SCIENCE@home

Exploring experiences of tilt and ragequitting in competitive and recreational videogamers

Devin Bonk,K. Tamminen

Published 2025 in Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

ABSTRACT

Abstract Gamers refer to tilt as a cyclical phenomenon where performance failures cause negative emotions leading to even poorer performance. When tilt experiences go unresolved, they can lead to ragequitting – an abrupt, and sometimes destructive, early removal of oneself from competition fueled by frustration. Few empirical studies have investigated gamers’ perceptions of these averse affective experiences and their consequences. The purpose of this study was to explore gamers’ experiences of tilt and ragequitting using the process model of emotion regulation as a sensitizing concept. Participants (N = 30; 77% men, 17% women, 3% non-binary, 3% agender, Mage = 25.5) were recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling across three broad categories of videogame engagement: recreational gamers, ranked gamers, and professional/collegiate esports athletes. Semi-structured interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative description from a critical realist perspective. Participants tended to describe tilt as having a compounding negative “snowball” effect on performance wherein performance failures prompt negative emotions which cloud judgements leading to poorer decisions and more performance failures. Ragequitting was described as the extreme result of an unmitigated bout of tilt, but also as a disdainful act that gamers regard very poorly. Participants described how external factors like pre-game moods, general dispositions, and social identities can influence the onset and trajectory of tilt and ragequitting. The discussion section provides insight into how practitioners can prevent performance failures and negative emotions from compounding on each other when things go awry in competition. Lay Summary Gamers experience tilt as a worsening cycle where the negative emotions that come with one performance failure affect their ability to perform and lead to more failures. This study explored the components of gamers’ tilt experiences, how tilt can lead to ragequits, and the strategies used to prevent it. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Gamers experience tilt when performance failures prompt negative emotions which cloud judgements, leading to poorer decisions and subsequent performance failures. Strategies like tactical pauses (e.g., taking a moment to reset before reengaging in competition), changes in gameplay tempo (e.g., taking up a more defensive strategy), or setting pre-commitment rules (e.g., always taking a break after 3 losses in a row) can help alleviate tilt and prevent ragequitting. Effective emotion regulation strategies can potentially prevent tilt if players’ emotion goals align with performance motives for emotion regulation (e.g., wanting to feel emotions that will help them perform better).

PUBLICATION RECORD

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-45 of 45 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY