When one wrong rights another: speakers passivize to express the subject as the experiencer in psychological verb use

Abstract Speakers have many choices for how to express a given message yet strongly prefer some over others. We suggest that one preference speakers have in spontaneous language use is presenting the experiencer of an emotion in a salient position: as the subject of the sentence. We extend prior work on the experiencer-as-subject bias to the understudied area of spontaneous language use. We examined a corpus for speakers’ choices regarding a) active versus passive sentences and b) two kinds of psychological verbs, subject-experiencer versus object-experiencer. Language users generally prefer active over passive sentences, and there is some evidence that object-experiencer verbs (e.g., Mary frightens Lisa) are dispreferred compared to subject-experiencer verbs (e.g., Lisa fears Mary) much as passive sentences are compared to active sentences. However, in line with an experiencer-as-subject bias, we show how one wrong can right another: speakers show a greater-than-expected preference to produce a generally dispreferred sentence structure, when doing so achieves the desired experiencer-as-subject. Specifically, we find stark differences in passive use rates: as many as 50 % of the uses of certain verbs in the dispreferred object-experiencer verb class are passive, while 4 % is the highest rate of passive sentences for verbs in the preferred subject-experiencer verb class.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory

• Publication date

  2025-04-10

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1515/cllt-2024-0091
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Implicit causality biases and thematic roles in American Sign Language

  2021cited by this paper
• Sentence formulation is easier when thematic and syntactic prominence align: evidence from psych verbs

  2021cited by this paper
• The link between lexical semantic features and children’s comprehension of English verbal be-passives

  2021cited by this paper
• Passives Cross-Linguistically

  2021cited by this paper
• Changes in Psych-verbs: A reanalysis of little v

  2014cited by this paper
• Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation

  2013cited by this paper
• Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: The advantages of finer-grained semantics

  2013cited by this paper
• Implicit causality bias in English: a corpus of 300 verbs

  2011cited by this paper
• Linking production and comprehension processes: the case of relative clauses.

  2009cited by this paper
• Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.

  2009cited by this paper
• The Locative Syntax of Experiencers

  2009cited by this paper
• Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.

  2008cited by this paper
• Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

  2007cited by this paper
• Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules

  2001cited by this paper
• Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy

  1994cited by this paper
• From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets.

  1993cited by this paper
• Thematic proto-roles and argument selection

  1991cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.