Do articles with multiple corresponding authorships have a citation advantage? A double machine learning analysis approach

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Scientometrics

• Publication date

  2025-04-28

• Fields of study

  Chemistry, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11192-025-05242-0
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Examining the quality of the corresponding authorship field in Web of Science and Scopus

  2024cited by this paper
• Do more heads imply better performance? An empirical study of team thought leaders' impact on scientific team performance

  2024cited by this paper
• Shared first authorship should be declared on academic CVs

  2023cited by this paper
• Are successful co-authors more important than first authors for publishing academic journal articles?

  2023cited by this paper
• Hyperauthorship: the publishing challenges for ‘big team’ science

  2023cited by this paper
• Quantifying revolutionary discoveries: Evidence from Nobel prize-winning papers

  2023cited by this paper
• Understanding co‐corresponding authorship: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview

  2023influential reference
• Citation bias in measuring knowledge flow: Evidence from the web of science at the discipline level

  2022cited by this paper
• Quantifying the social impacts of the London Night Tube with a double/debiased machine learning based difference-in-differences approach

  2022cited by this paper
• Contributorship in scientific collaborations: The perspective of contribution-based byline orders

  2022cited by this paper
• Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science

  2022cited by this paper
• How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited

  2022cited by this paper
• Proximity‐aware research leadership recommendation in research collaboration via deep neural networks

  2021cited by this paper
• Team Size, Research Variety, and Research Performance: Do Coauthors' Coauthors Matter?

  2021cited by this paper
• The Science of Science

  2021cited by this paper
• The open access effect in social media exposure of scholarly articles: A matched-pair analysis

  2021cited by this paper
• Various aspects of interdisciplinarity in research and how to quantify and measure those

  2021cited by this paper
• Is funding related to higher research impact? Exploring its relationship and the mediating role of collaboration in several disciplines

  2021cited by this paper
• Combining deep neural network and bibliometric indicator for emerging research topic prediction

  2021cited by this paper
• Characterizing scientists leaving science before their time: Evidence from mathematics

  2021cited by this paper
• Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit

  2021cited by this paper
• Young stars and red giants: The moderating effect of age diversity on the relationship between the proportion of high performers and team performance.

  2021cited by this paper
• International Collaboration in Open Access Publications: How Income Shapes International Collaboration

  2020cited by this paper
• Causal mediation analysis with double machine learning

  2020cited by this paper
• Double machine learning with gradient boosting and its application to the Big N audit quality effect

  2020cited by this paper
• Does corresponding authorship influence scientific impact in collaboration: Brazilian institutions as a case of study

  2020cited by this paper
• An in-depth analysis of government funding and international collaboration in scientific research

  2020cited by this paper
• Early-stage reciprocity in sustainable scientific collaboration

  2020cited by this paper
• A qualitative study of Equal Co-First Authorship

  2020cited by this paper
• Mapping research collaborations in different countries and regions: 1980–2019

  2020cited by this paper
• Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching

  2019cited by this paper
• Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

  2019cited by this paper
• International collaboration in higher education research: A gravity model approach

  2019cited by this paper
• Five ways China must cultivate research integrity

  2019cited by this paper
• Understanding persistent scientific collaboration

  2018cited by this paper
• Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications

  2017cited by this paper
• Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters

  2017cited by this paper
• Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effects

  2017cited by this paper
• Do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science?

  2017cited by this paper
• Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology

  2017cited by this paper
• A Theoretical Foundation for the Ethical Distribution of Authorship in Multidisciplinary Publications

  2017cited by this paper
• Equal authorship for equal authors: personal experience as an equal author in twenty peer-reviewed medical publications during the last three years.

  2017cited by this paper
• New Year address from Zoological Research.

  2016cited by this paper
• Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature

  2016cited by this paper
• The co‐first and co‐corresponding author phenomenon in the pharmacy and anesthesia journals

  2016influential reference
• Evolution in the number of authors of computer science publications

  2016cited by this paper
• Analysis of intra-institutional research collaboration: a case of a Serbian faculty of sciences

  2016cited by this paper
• The role of inter-professional collaboration to support science learning: An exploratory study of the perceptions and experiences of science teachers, public librarians, and school librarians

  2016cited by this paper
• A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

  2015cited by this paper
• Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact

  2015cited by this paper
• What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members?

  2015cited by this paper
• The Too-Much-Talent Effect: Team Interdependence Determines When More Talent Is Too Much or Not Enough

  2014cited by this paper
• International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines

  2014cited by this paper
• A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation

  2014cited by this paper
• Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900

  2014cited by this paper
• Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics

  2014cited by this paper
• Scientific group leaders’ authorship preferences: an empirical investigation

  2014cited by this paper
• Funded collaboration research in mathematics in China

  2014cited by this paper
• How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?

  2013cited by this paper
• Cross-campus collaboration: A scientometric and network case study of publication activity across two campuses of a single institution

  2013cited by this paper
• Increased co‐first authorships in biomedical and clinical publications: a call for recognition

  2013cited by this paper
• Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering

  2013cited by this paper
• The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application

  2013cited by this paper
• How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects

  2013cited by this paper
• Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective

  2013cited by this paper
• Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties

  2013cited by this paper
• Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely

  2012cited by this paper
• Status Conflict in Groups

  2012cited by this paper
• Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries

  2012cited by this paper
• Where you publish matters most: A multilevel analysis of factors affecting citations of internet studies

  2012cited by this paper
• The Path to Glory Is Paved With Hierarchy

  2012cited by this paper
• Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts

  2012cited by this paper
• Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations

  2012cited by this paper
• Multiple open access availability and citation impact

  2011cited by this paper
• Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position

  2011cited by this paper
• A functional model of hierarchy

  2011cited by this paper
• Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing

  2011cited by this paper
• The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance.

  2011cited by this paper
• "Equal" contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship.

  2010cited by this paper
• Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods

  2010cited by this paper
• Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance

  2010cited by this paper
• The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field

  2010cited by this paper
• Countries positioning in open access journals system: An investigation of citation distribution patterns

  2009cited by this paper
• Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications

  2009cited by this paper
• Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports

  2008cited by this paper
• Across institutional boundaries?: Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience

  2008cited by this paper
• Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science

  2008cited by this paper
• The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge

  2007cited by this paper
• Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies

  2006influential reference
• Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact

  2005cited by this paper
• Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999

  2005influential reference
• Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis.

  2003cited by this paper
• Science and information theory

  1956cited by this paper

• A CRediT‐based quantitative study of co‐corresponding authorship: Collaboration patterns and contribution distribution

  2026cites this paper
• The emerging phenomenon of multiple corresponding authorship in China

  2025cites this paper