Evaluation of Post-Quantum Key Encapsulation Methods in 5G Core Network

The fifth generation of mobile networks (5G) is among the critical infrastructures whose security and privacy requirements are paramount. Compared to previous generations, 5G leverages a service-based architecture where many Network Functions (NF), i.e., the set of microservices on which is based the architecture, need secure communication means. NFs can communicate using HTTP2, and despite not being required by the standard, they can use Transport Layer Protocol (TLS) to ensure data integrity and authentication across the network. However, with the expected arrival of quantum computers in the near future, traditional cryptographic algorithms are under significant threat. With the recent run for post-quantum standardization, the NIST selected possible candidate algorithms. However, no study evaluates whether such algorithms would be applicable in the 5G core without significant performance degradation. In this paper, we perform the first assessment of the feasibility of using post-quantum secure Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) for the 5G core network. To this aim, we implemented and compared the performances of five algorithms among those selected during the NIST standardization process. We adapted those algorithms to implement them in a standalone 5G core implemented via Open5GS, and tested their performance when performing user registration. Our results show that the KY-BER768 achieves comparable performance to TLS in terms of UE registration time and CPU utilization, thus being a candidate solution to improve the security posture of the 5G core.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference

• Publication date

  2025-03-24

• Fields of study

  Computer Science, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1109/WCNC61545.2025.10978792
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Constrained Device Performance Benchmarking with the Implementation of Post-Quantum Cryptography

  2024cited by this paper
• Performance Evaluation of Transport Layer Security in the 5G Core Control Plane

  2024influential reference
• Post-quantum distributed ledger technology: a systematic survey

  2023cited by this paper
• A Survey of Post-Quantum Cryptography: Start of a New Race

  2023cited by this paper
• Evaluating the performance of open source software implementations of the 5G network core

  2023cited by this paper
• Trade-offs in Post-Quantum Cryptography: A Comparative Assessment of BIKE, HQC, and Classic McEliece

  2023cited by this paper
• An Efficient Key Recovery Attack on SIDH

  2023cited by this paper
• CRYSTALS-Kyber

  2022cited by this paper
• KEMTLS vs. Post-quantum TLS: Performance on Embedded Systems

  2022cited by this paper
• Post-Quantum Hybrid KEMTLS Performance in Simulated and Real Network Environments

  2022cited by this paper
• Performance Evaluation for a Post-Quantum Public-Key Cryptosystem

  2021cited by this paper
• 5G Security Challenges and Solutions: A Review by OSI Layers

  2021cited by this paper
• Performance Evaluation and Optimisation for Kyber on the MULTOS IoT Trust-Anchor

  2020cited by this paper
• Quantum Security Analysis of AES

  2019cited by this paper
• Post-quantum Key Exchange for the Internet and the Open Quantum Safe Project

  2016influential reference
• Post-Quantum Key Exchange for the TLS Protocol from the Ring Learning with Errors Problem

  2015cited by this paper
• The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3

  2008cited by this paper
• The Mathematics of Public-Key Cryptography

  1979cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.