Docking-based virtual screening tools customized to mine ultralarge chemical spaces are consistently reported to yield both higher hit rates and more potent ligands than that achieved by conventional docking of smaller million-sized compound libraries. This remarkable achievement is however counterbalanced by the absolute necessity to design an efficient postprocessing of the millions of potential virtual hits for selecting a few chemically diverse compounds for synthesis and biological evaluation. We here retrospectively analyzed ten successful ultralarge virtual screening hit lists that underwent in vitro binding assays, for binding affinity prediction using eight rescoring methods including simple empirical scoring functions, machine learning, molecular-mechanics and quantum-mechanics approaches. Although the best predictions usually rely on the most sophisticated methods, none of the tested rescoring methods could robustly distinguish known binders from inactive compounds, across all assays. Energy refinement of protein-ligand complexes, prior to rescoring, marginally helped molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics approaches but deteriorates predictions from empirical and machine learning scoring functions.
On the Difficulty to Rescore Hits from Ultralarge Docking Screens
François Sindt,G. Bret,D. Rognan
Published 2025 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publication date
2025-05-22
- Fields of study
Medicine, Chemistry, Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-56 of 56 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-7 of 7 citing papers · Page 1 of 1