Minimal activation of the p53 DNA damage response by a modular cytosine base editor enables effective multiplexed gene knockout in induced pluripotent stem cells

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  bioRxiv

• Publication date

  2025-06-07

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Engineering

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1101/2025.06.05.656583
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Pluripotent stem-cell-derived therapies in clinical trial: A 2025 update.

  2025cited by this paper
• Engineering APOBEC3A deaminase for highly accurate and efficient base editing

  2024cited by this paper
• Engineered cytosine base editor enabling broad-scope and high-fidelity gene editing in Streptomyces

  2024cited by this paper
• Enhancing genome editing in hPSCs through dual inhibition of DNA damage response and repair pathways

  2024cited by this paper
• A high efficiency precision genome editing method with CRISPR in iPSCs

  2024cited by this paper
• Design of highly functional genome editors by modeling the universe of CRISPR-Cas sequences

  2024cited by this paper
• Activation of immune signals during organ transplantation

  2023cited by this paper
• Engineering of cytosine base editors with DNA damage minimization and editing scope diversification

  2023cited by this paper
• An aptamer-mediated base editing platform for simultaneous knockin and multiple gene knockout for allogeneic CAR-T cells generation

  2023cited by this paper
• Hypoimmune anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells provide lasting tumor control in fully immunocompetent allogeneic humanized mice

  2023cited by this paper
• TadA orthologs enable both cytosine and adenine editing of base editors

  2023cited by this paper
• Genome Editing of Pluripotent Stem Cells for Adoptive and Regenerative Cell Therapies

  2022cited by this paper
• Frequent Aneuploidy in Primary Human T Cells after CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage

  2022cited by this paper
• Highly efficient generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cell models using prime editing

  2022cited by this paper
• CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine and adenosine base editing of splice-sites mediates highly-efficient disruption of proteins in primary and immortalized cells

  2021cited by this paper
• CRISPR/Cas9-Induced DNA Damage Enriches for Mutations in a p53-Linked Interactome: Implications for CRISPR-Based Therapies

  2021cited by this paper
• Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in hematopoietic stem cells for fetal hemoglobin reinduction generates chromosomal translocations

  2021cited by this paper
• Base editing of haematopoietic stem cells rescues sickle cell disease in mice

  2021cited by this paper
• A systematic genome-wide mapping of oncogenic mutation selection during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing

  2021cited by this paper
• Development and Characterization of a Modular CRISPR and RNA Aptamer Mediated Base Editing System

  2021cited by this paper
• Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos

  2020cited by this paper
• 53BP1: a DSB escort

  2020cited by this paper
• CRISPR-engineered T cells in patients with refractory cancer

  2020cited by this paper
• Therapeutic base editing of human hematopoietic stem cells

  2020cited by this paper
• Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity

  2020cited by this paper
• Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application

  2020cited by this paper
• Genetic Ablation of HLA Class I, Class II, and the T-cell Receptor Enables Allogeneic T Cells to Be Used for Adoptive T-cell Therapy

  2020cited by this paper
• Efficient Generation and Correction of Mutations in Human iPS Cells Utilizing mRNAs of CRISPR Base Editors and Prime Editors

  2020cited by this paper
• Cas9 activates the p53 pathway and selects for p53-inactivating mutations

  2020cited by this paper
• Cas12a Base Editors Induce Efficient and Specific Editing with Low DNA Damage Response.

  2020influential reference
• Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors

  2020cited by this paper
• Single C-to-T substitution using engineered APOBEC3G-nCas9 base editors with minimum genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target effects

  2020cited by this paper
• Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing

  2020cited by this paper
• CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and β-Thalassemia.

  2020cited by this paper
• Genome-edited, donor-derived allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in paediatric and adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of two phase 1 studies.

  2020cited by this paper
• CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations

  2019cited by this paper
• BEAT: A Python Program to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing

  2019cited by this paper
• Recurrent Genetic Abnormalities in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Definition and Routine Detection in Culture Supernatant by Targeted Droplet Digital PCR

  2019cited by this paper
• High Basal Levels of γH2AX in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Are Linked to Replication‐Associated DNA Damage and Repair

  2018influential reference
• Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements

  2018cited by this paper
• p53 inhibits CRISPR–Cas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells

  2018cited by this paper
• Highly efficient multiplex human T cell engineering without double-strand breaks using Cas9 base editors

  2018cited by this paper
• Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells

  2018cited by this paper
• A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks is sufficient to delay cell cycle progression

  2018cited by this paper
• CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing Enables Efficient Disruption of Eukaryotic Genes through Induction of STOP Codons.

  2017cited by this paper
• Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations

  2017cited by this paper
• Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity

  2017cited by this paper
• Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions

  2017cited by this paper
• CRISPR-STOP: gene silencing through base-editing-induced nonsense mutations

  2017cited by this paper
• Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage

  2016cited by this paper
• Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications

  2016cited by this paper
• p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process.

  2016cited by this paper
• 53BP1 Integrates DNA Repair and p53-Dependent Cell Fate Decisions via Distinct Mechanisms

  2016cited by this paper
• A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells

  2016cited by this paper
• Non-canonical uracil processing in DNA gives rise to double-strand breaks and deletions: relevance to class switch recombination

  2016cited by this paper
• DNA damage foci: Meaning and significance

  2015cited by this paper
• Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing for Correction of Dystrophin Mutations that Cause Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

  2015cited by this paper
• A 26-hour system of highly sensitive whole genome sequencing for emergency management of genetic diseases

  2015cited by this paper
• CHROMOTHRIPSIS FROM DNA DAMAGE IN MICRONUCLEI

  2015cited by this paper
• Temporal Analysis of Genome Alterations Induced by Single-Cell Passaging in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

  2015cited by this paper
• Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition

  2014cited by this paper
• A robust method to derive functional neural crest cells from human pluripotent stem cells.

  2013cited by this paper
• Human Embryonic Stem Cells Fail to Activate CHK1 and Commit to Apoptosis in Response to DNA Replication Stress

  2012cited by this paper
• Mechanisms of rejection: current perspectives.

  2012cited by this paper
• Human embryonic stem cells have constitutively active Bax at the Golgi and are primed to undergo rapid apoptosis.

  2012influential reference
• A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity

  2012cited by this paper
• APOBEC3A can activate the DNA damage response and cause cell‐cycle arrest

  2011cited by this paper
• A Universal System for Highly Efficient Cardiac Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells That Eliminates Interline Variability

  2011cited by this paper
• γH2AX: a sensitive molecular marker of DNA damage and repair

  2010cited by this paper
• Specificity of T-cell alloreactivity

  2007cited by this paper
• Tumor Suppressor P53 Binding Protein 1 (53bp1) Is Involved in DNA Damage–Signaling Pathways

  2001cited by this paper
• Hypersensitivity to DNA damage leads to increased apoptosis during early mouse development.

  2000cited by this paper
• DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139*

  1998cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.