Weaponizing Visibility: Online Shaming and Vigilantism During COVID-19

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Asian Communication Research

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.20879/acr.2025.22.009
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• #CancelCulture: Examining definitions and motivations

  2022cited by this paper
• Impact of justice‐related dispositions on support for cyber vigilantism: The mediating effect of perceived severity of transgression

  2022cited by this paper
• A tale of two city-states: A comparison of the state-led vs civil society-led responses to COVID-19 in Singapore and Hong Kong

  2021cited by this paper
• Nonmaleficence in Shaming: The Ethical Dilemma Underlying Participation in Online Public Shaming

  2021cited by this paper
• Online Social Shaming and the Moralistic Imagination: The Emergence of Internet‐Based Performative Shaming

  2020cited by this paper
• Older Adults’ Online Shopping Continuance Intentions: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior

  2020cited by this paper
• The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions

  2020cited by this paper
• The role of social support and its influence on exercise participation: The perspective of self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior

  2020cited by this paper
• The many shades of digital vigilantism. A typology of online self-justice

  2019cited by this paper
• Everyday authoritarianism: a political anthropology of Singapore

  2018cited by this paper
• Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Recycling Behavior in South Africa

  2018cited by this paper
• Self-Control, Injunctive Norms, and Descriptive Norms Predict Engagement in Plagiarism in a Theory of Planned Behavior Model

  2018cited by this paper
• Digital Vigilantism as Weaponisation of Visibility

  2017cited by this paper
• Socioeconomic status and online shaming: The mediating role of belief in a just world

  2017cited by this paper
• Online Shaming and the Right to Privacy

  2017cited by this paper
• The hazards of cyber-vigilantism

  2016cited by this paper
• Predicting Prosocial Behavior Toward Sex-Trafficked Persons: The Roles of Empathy, Belief in a Just World, and Attitudes Toward Prostitution

  2015cited by this paper
• Belief in a Just World

  2015cited by this paper
• Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour

  2014cited by this paper
• Organ donation intentions and behaviors: application and extension of the theory of planned behavior

  2013cited by this paper
• When do people derogate or psychologically distance themselves from victims? Belief in a just world and ingroup identification

  2012cited by this paper
• Culture’s Constraints

  2012cited by this paper
• When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness

  2011cited by this paper
• The Influence of Chronically Accessible Autonomous and Controlling Motives on Physical Activity Within an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior

  2011cited by this paper
• Online Shaming in the Asian Context: Community Empowerment or Civic Vigilantism?

  2010cited by this paper
• Justice by Any Means Necessary: Vigilantism among Indian Women

  2009cited by this paper
• Remaking Public Participation: The Case of Singapore

  2009cited by this paper
• Belief in a just world and well-being of bullies, victims and defenders: a study with Portuguese and Indian students

  2009cited by this paper
• Predictors of intentions to perform six cancer-related behaviours: Roles for injunctive and descriptive norms

  2008cited by this paper
• A Theory of Planned Behavior Study of College Students' Intention to Register as Organ Donors in Japan, Korea, and the United States

  2007cited by this paper
• Incorporating Culture into the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Smoking Cessation Intentions among College Students

  2006cited by this paper
• An Explication of Social Norms

  2005cited by this paper
• Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs

  2005cited by this paper
• Information and Expression in a Digital Age

  2005cited by this paper
• Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis

  2003cited by this paper
• Two spheres of belief in justice: extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world.

  2003cited by this paper
• Motivations to Participate in Riparian Improvement Programs

  2002cited by this paper
• The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating.

  2002cited by this paper
• Expanding the Theory of Planned Behaviour: The Role of Social Norms and Group Identification

  2002cited by this paper
• The Importance of Distinguishing the Belief in a Just World for Self Versus for Others: Implications for Psychological Well-Being

  1996cited by this paper
• WHAT IS VIGILANTISM

  1996cited by this paper
• Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.

  1978cited by this paper
• Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

  1966cited by this paper

• How to prompt ethical use? Investigating students’ intention to use ChatGPT for graded assignments

  2025cites this paper