When are scientific findings deemed practically or theoretically relevant? A literature review on minimum-effect testing

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  The Quantitative Methods for Psychology

• Publication date

  2025-07-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.20982/tqmp.21.2.p082
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Assessing power analysis practices in eyewitness research: A review and simulation study.

  2025cited by this paper
• Ready to ROC? A tutorial on simulation-based power analyses for null hypothesis significance, minimum-effect, and equivalence testing for ROC curve analyses

  2025cited by this paper
• Simulation-Based Power Analyses for the Smallest Effect Size of Interest: A Confidence-Interval Approach for Minimum-Effect and Equivalence Testing

  2024cited by this paper
• On the use of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve in eyewitness memory research

  2024cited by this paper
• If generalization is the grail, practical relevance is the nirvana: Considerations from the contribution of psychological science of memory to law.

  2023cited by this paper
• Tipping the analytical scales, investigating the use of frequentist equivalence analyses in psychology: a scoping review

  2023cited by this paper
• Null regions: a unified conceptual framework for statistical inference

  2023cited by this paper
• Determining Negligible Associations in Regression

  2023cited by this paper
• The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value

  2021cited by this paper
• Expert Opinions on the Smallest Effect Size of Interest in False Memory Research

  2021cited by this paper
• Results everyone can understand: A review of common language effect size indicators to bridge the research-practice gap.

  2021cited by this paper
• Effect size reporting and interpretation in social personality research

  2020cited by this paper
• Denouncing the use of field-specific effect size distributions to inform magnitude

  2020cited by this paper
• Characterization of Models for Identifying Physical and Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2020cited by this paper
• Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense

  2019cited by this paper
• Scientists rise up against statistical significance

  2019cited by this paper
• Exploring perceptions of meaningfulness in visual representations of bivariate relationships

  2019cited by this paper
• Using Anchor-Based Methods to Determine the Smallest Effect Size of Interest

  2019cited by this paper
• Welcome to the Tidyverse

  2019cited by this paper
• Meaningful change definitions: sample size planning for experimental intervention research

  2019cited by this paper
• ggplot2

  2019cited by this paper
• Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial

  2018cited by this paper
• Reporting Effect Sizes in Original Psychological Research: A Discussion and Tutorial

  2017cited by this paper
• The New Statistics

  2017cited by this paper
• Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients.

  2014cited by this paper
• Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

  2012cited by this paper
• The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science

  2012cited by this paper
• A Comprehensive Review of Effect Size Reporting and Interpreting Practices in Academic Journals in Education and Psychology.

  2010cited by this paper
• Confidence Intervals: From tests of statistical significance to confidence intervals, range hypotheses and substantial effects

  2006cited by this paper
• Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.

  2004cited by this paper
• Mindless statistics

  2004cited by this paper
• Testing the hypothesis that treatments have negligible effects : Minimum-effect tests in the general linear model

  1999cited by this paper
• HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known

  1998cited by this paper
• Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come

  1996cited by this paper
• Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups.

  1993cited by this paper
• Standardized regression coefficients: a further critique and review of some alternatives.

  1991cited by this paper
• The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect.

  1986cited by this paper
• Rationality in psychological research: The good-enough principle.

  1985cited by this paper
• Bioavailability--a problem in equivalence.

  1974cited by this paper
• Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox

  1967cited by this paper

• Meaningful approaches to assessing the size of effects in memory research: applications and recommendations for study design, interpretation, and analysis

  2025influential citation
• Investigating how adopting different deceptive strategies simultaneously affects memory.

  2025cites this paper
• Attentional bias and tobacco smoking frequency: A reflection on Bartlett et al. (2022)

  2025cites this paper
• From significant to meaningful: ATOMizing the study of sex differences and similarities.

  2025cites this paper