Measuring conspiracy beliefs among Democrats and Republicans: A test of the measurement invariance of four short-form conspiracist ideation scales

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Personality and Individual Differences

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2025.113365
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Dynamic measurement invariance cutoffs for two-group fit index differences.

  2025cited by this paper
• Assessing Conspiracist Ideation Reliably, Validly, and Efficiently: A Psychometric Comparison of Five Short-Form Measures

  2025cited by this paper
• The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale-5: further psychometric evaluation using a United Kingdom-based sample

  2023cited by this paper
• Assessing conspiracist beliefs across societies: Validation of the Serbian adaptation of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (GCBS).

  2023cited by this paper
• On modeling the correlates of conspiracy thinking

  2023cited by this paper
• Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries

  2022cited by this paper
• Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time?

  2022cited by this paper
• The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale – 5: A short-form measure of conspiracist ideation

  2022cited by this paper
• Validation of the Spanish Version of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale

  2022cited by this paper
• Validity testing of the conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiment scales during the COVID-19 pandemic across 24 languages from a large-scale global dataset

  2022cited by this paper
• Are Republicans and Conservatives More Likely to Believe Conspiracy Theories?

  2022cited by this paper
• The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking

  2021cited by this paper
• Conspiracy Thinking in Europe and America: A Comparative Study

  2020cited by this paper
• Psychometric assessment of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale

  2020cited by this paper
• Understanding Conspiracy Theories

  2019cited by this paper
• ‘Grandpa, Do you like Roller Coasters?’: Identifying Age–Appropriate Personality Indicators

  2019cited by this paper
• An Asymmetrical “President-in-Power” Effect

  2018cited by this paper
• An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers

  2017cited by this paper
• Does Extreme Political Ideology Predict Conspiracy Beliefs, Economic Evaluations and Political Trust? Evidence From Sweden

  2017cited by this paper
• Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories.

  2017cited by this paper
• Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural

  2017cited by this paper
• Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change

  2016cited by this paper
• What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions

  2016cited by this paper
• Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories

  2015cited by this paper
• Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion

  2014cited by this paper
• The Big Five Personality Factors and Mass Politics

  2013cited by this paper
• Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale

  2013cited by this paper
• Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire

  2013cited by this paper
• Reality testing, conspiracy theories, and paranormal beliefs

  2012cited by this paper
• lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling

  2012cited by this paper
• Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.

  2011cited by this paper
• Comparing Democrats and Republicans on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Values

  2009cited by this paper
• Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

  2009cited by this paper
• Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

  2007cited by this paper
• Do Self-Report Instruments Allow Meaningful Comparisons Across Diverse Population Groups?: Testing Measurement Invariance Using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework

  2006cited by this paper
• The Perceived Risk of Terrorism

  2005cited by this paper
• A Comparison of Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Methodologies for Establishing Measurement Equivalence/Invariance

  2004cited by this paper
• Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

  1999cited by this paper
• Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

  1996cited by this paper
• Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals

  1985cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.