Enhancing natural habitats conservation success on private lands by understanding and addressing deficiencies in social capital

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Land Use Policy

• Publication date

  2025-10-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107687
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Remote participatory research has logistical benefits, but presents scientific and ethical challenges

  2023cited by this paper
• Lessons learnt from multiple private land conservation programs in Canada to inform species at risk conservation

  2022cited by this paper
• Transformation beyond conservation: how critical social science can contribute to a radical new agenda in biodiversity conservation

  2021cited by this paper
• Towards collective action in ecosystem services governance: The recognition of social interdependencies in three collective agri-environmental initiatives in Quebec

  2021cited by this paper
• THE MANIFESTATION OF SOCIAL REPRESENTATION THEORY AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN A GENTRIFIED NEIGHBOURHOOD IN A POST-SOCIALIST COUNTRY, ESTONIA

  2021cited by this paper
• Intervention levers for increasing social acceptance of conservation measures on private land: a systematic literature review and comprehensive typology

  2020cited by this paper
• A review of critical perspectives on private land conservation in academic literature

  2019cited by this paper
• Measuring, mapping and quantifying the effects of trust and informal communication on transboundary collaboration in the Great Lakes fisheries policy network

  2019cited by this paper
• Environmental Governance – From Public to Private?

  2018cited by this paper
• Landowner and Practitioner Perspectives on Private Land Conservation Programs

  2018cited by this paper
• Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation

  2017cited by this paper
• Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study

  2017cited by this paper
• Wonder, ignorance, and resistance: Landowners and the stewardship of endangered species

  2017cited by this paper
• The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts

  2016cited by this paper
• Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design

  2016cited by this paper
• The Refugee Crisis in Europe: True Causes, False Solutions

  2016cited by this paper
• Trends in Private Land Conservation: Increasing Complexity, Shifting Conservation Purposes and Allowable Private Land Uses

  2016cited by this paper
• Breaking the bundle of rights: Conservation easements and the legal geographies of individuating nature

  2016cited by this paper
• A network approach to assessing social capacity for landscape planning: The case of fire-prone forests in Oregon, USA

  2016cited by this paper
• Social Capital and Governance: A social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland

  2015cited by this paper
• Protection privée de la biodiversité et fiscalisation du marché de la wilderness : une histoire de la conservation volontaire au Québec (1980-2014)

  2015cited by this paper
• Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn

  2015cited by this paper
• Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system

  2015cited by this paper
• Scale Mismatches, Conservation Planning, and the Value of Social‐Network Analyses

  2013cited by this paper
• Governing protected areas to fulfil biodiversity conservation obligations: from Habermasian ideals to a more instrumental reality

  2013cited by this paper
• What is Really Social Capital? A Critical Review

  2011cited by this paper
• Social Representations Theory

  2011cited by this paper
• Mapping Human and Social Dimensions of Conservation Opportunity for the Scheduling of Conservation Action on Private Land

  2010cited by this paper
• Ready for engagement: using key informant interviews to measure community social capacity

  2010cited by this paper
• Trust Mediates Conservation-Related Behaviors

  2010cited by this paper
• Best Practice Environmental Impact Assessment: A Model Framework for Australia

  2010cited by this paper
• The Challenge of Regulating Private Wildlife Ranches for Conservation in South Africa

  2010cited by this paper
• Devising Appropriate Policies and Instruments in Support of Private Conservation Areas: Lessons Learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa

  2010cited by this paper
• Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital

  2009cited by this paper
• The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?

  2009cited by this paper
• Social Network Analysis of Social Capital in Collaborative Planning

  2009cited by this paper
• False Starts and False Solutions: Current Approaches in Dealing with Climate Change

  2008cited by this paper
• Neoliberalizing environmental governance? Land trusts, private conservation and nature on the Oak Ridges Moraine

  2008cited by this paper
• Forms and Paradoxes of Principles Based Regulation

  2008cited by this paper
• Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data

  2008cited by this paper
• From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons

  2006cited by this paper
• A Conceptual Model of Community Capacity for Biodiversity Conservation Outcomes

  2006cited by this paper
• Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: Interpretation for implementation

  2005cited by this paper
• Understanding social capital: learning from the analysis and experience of participation

  2005cited by this paper
• Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

  2005cited by this paper
• Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept?*

  2005cited by this paper
• Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management

  2004cited by this paper
• Re‐evaluating the Contribution of Social Capital in Achieving Sustainable Development

  2004cited by this paper
• Placing social capital

  2002cited by this paper
• Forms of Capital

  2002cited by this paper
• On the Empirics of Social Capital

  2002cited by this paper
• Social Capital and Development: The Coming Agenda

  2002cited by this paper
• Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities: People, livelihoods and collective action in biodiversity management

  2002cited by this paper
• Tourism Carrying Capacity: Tempting Fantasy or Useful Reality?

  2001cited by this paper
• Statistical Analysis of Sensitive Topics in Group and Individual Interviews

  2000cited by this paper
• Social Representations and beyond: Brute Facts, Symbolic Coping and Domesticated Worlds

  1998cited by this paper
• Outcome-based policies fore sustainable logging in community forests: reducing forest bureaucracy.

  1998cited by this paper
• Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage

  1998cited by this paper
• Perverse Social Capital—Some Evidence from Colombia

  1997cited by this paper
• Notes towards a description of Social Representations

  1988cited by this paper
• Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital

  1988cited by this paper
• Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness

  1985cited by this paper
• Journal of Communication ISSN 0021-9916 ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Communicative Approach to Social Capital

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.