Mobilizer, demobilizer–or artefact? Measuring the influence of research designs on the direct effect of negative advertising on voter turnout in U.S. election campaigns

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  International Journal of Advertising

• Publication date

  2025-07-23

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/02650487.2025.2536907
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Heterogeneity in effect size estimates

  2024cited by this paper
• A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout

  2023cited by this paper
• Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comprehensive overview

  2023cited by this paper
• The Conditional Effects of Microtargeted Facebook Advertisements on Voter Turnout

  2022cited by this paper
• Negative campaigning

  2022cited by this paper
• Limitations of Meta-analyses of Studies With High Heterogeneity.

  2020cited by this paper
• Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news

  2019cited by this paper
• Negative campaigning and its consequences: a review and a look ahead

  2019cited by this paper
• Negative Advertisements and Voter Turnout: The Evidence from Mexico

  2017cited by this paper
• Rethinking the Concept of Negativity: An Empirical Approach

  2017cited by this paper
• Political Advertising in 2016: The Presidential Election as Outlier?

  2016cited by this paper
• Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices

  2015cited by this paper
• Negative Campaigning in Western Europe: Similar or Different?

  2014cited by this paper
• The Persuasive Effects of Partisan Campaign Mailers

  2014cited by this paper
• Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.

  2014cited by this paper
• Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer

  2014cited by this paper
• The embarrassment of riches?: A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout

  2013cited by this paper
• What really matters is which camp goes dirty: Differential effects of negative campaigning on turnout during Swiss federal ballots

  2013cited by this paper
• Revealed or Concealed? Transparency of Procedures, Decisions, and Judgment Calls in Meta-Analyses

  2012cited by this paper
• When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout

  2011cited by this paper
• It's My Campaign I'll Cry if I Want to: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals

  2011cited by this paper
• Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns

  2011cited by this paper
• Elements of Negativity: Volume and Proportion in Exposure to Negative Advertising

  2009cited by this paper
• Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

  2009cited by this paper
• The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment

  2007cited by this paper
• US Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election

  2007cited by this paper
• Introduction: Consequences of low turnout

  2007cited by this paper
• Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate

  2007cited by this paper
• Filling in the Blanks: A New Method for Estimating Campaign Effects

  2006cited by this paper
• Revisiting the Influence of Campaign Tone on Turnout in Senate Elections

  2006cited by this paper
• A Field Experiment on the Effects of Negative Campaign Mail on Voter Turnout in a Municipal Election

  2006cited by this paper
• Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses

  2006cited by this paper
• What Voters Want From Political Campaign Communication

  2005cited by this paper
• Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions

  2005cited by this paper
• “Targeted” Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election

  2004cited by this paper
• Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections

  2003cited by this paper
• Why Is Research on the Effects of Negative Campaigning So Inconclusive? Understanding Citizens’ Perceptions of Negativity

  2003cited by this paper
• Cognitive Responses to Negative and Comparative Political Advertising

  2002cited by this paper
• Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect

  2002cited by this paper
• Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads

  1999cited by this paper
• Political Advertising and Public Mood: A Study of Children's Political Orientations

  1999cited by this paper
• Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout

  1999cited by this paper
• The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment

  1999cited by this paper
• Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation

  1999cited by this paper
• A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising

  1998cited by this paper
• Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?

  1996cited by this paper
• In Defense of Negative Campaigning

  1996cited by this paper
• Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?

  1994cited by this paper
• Effects of negative political advertising on the political process

  1990cited by this paper
• NINE SECOND‐ORDER NATIONAL ELECTIONS – A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ELECTION RESULTS

  1980cited by this paper
• Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.

  1950cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.