Workforce Implications From Farm Automation

US agriculture is evolving rapidly, especially with the development of new and more complex labor‐saving technologies. This study overviews the workforce implications of agricultural automation, including those for employment, wages, job quality, and more. Contrary to beliefs that automation reduces employment, we show that automation can raise employment and wages by increasing farm production and creating higher‐paid and more desirable jobs in complementary sectors. These workforce implications are mediated by the factors that drive adoption and how effects permeate across the agri‐food system, suggesting that governments play a key role in ensuring positive workforce outcomes through policymaking and funding allocations.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

• Publication date

  2025-07-23

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/aepp.70009
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Economic viability of robotic fruit harvesters to reduce large seasonal labor demands: Analysis of Gala and Honeycrisp apples

  2025cited by this paper
• Robots in Agriculture – A case-based discussion of ethical concerns on job loss, responsibility, and data control

  2024cited by this paper
• Smart Shelf System for Customer Behavior Tracking in Supermarkets

  2024cited by this paper
• Air pollution, weather, and agricultural worker productivity

  2023cited by this paper
• Safety of Automated Agricultural Machineries: A Systematic Literature Review

  2023cited by this paper
• America's farms and ranches at a glance

  2023cited by this paper
• Housing booms and H‐2A agricultural guest worker employment

  2022cited by this paper
• Agri-food Value Chain Revolutions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

  2022cited by this paper
• Robots and Firm Investment

  2022cited by this paper
• Is ICE Freezing US agriculture? Farm-level adjustment to increased local immigration enforcement

  2022cited by this paper
• Stringent immigration enforcement and the farm sector: Evidence from E‐Verify adoption across states

  2022cited by this paper
• The Innovation of the Cashierless Store: A Preliminary Analysis in Italy

  2022cited by this paper
• Consolidated Advantage: New Organizational Dynamics of Wage Inequality

  2021cited by this paper
• First market study in e-commerce food packaging: Resources, performance, and trends

  2021cited by this paper
• Job Turf or Variety: Task Structure as a Source of Organizational Inequality

  2020cited by this paper
• The Future of Food: Environmental Lessons from E-Commerce.

  2020cited by this paper
• Digital Transformation of the Agricultural Sector: Pathways, Drivers and Policy Implications

  2020cited by this paper
• Truck-Driving Jobs: Are They Headed for Rapid Elimination?

  2020cited by this paper
• Can Technology Compensate for a Labor Shortage? Effects of 287(g) Immigration Policies on the U.S. Dairy Industry

  2020cited by this paper
• Viewpoint: The future of work in agri-food

  2020cited by this paper
• NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COMPETING WITH ROBOTS: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE

  2020cited by this paper
• 19th Century Development of Refrigeration in The American Meat Packing Industry

  2019cited by this paper
• From Immigrants to Robots: The Changing Locus of Substitutes for Workers

  2019cited by this paper
• Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets

  2019cited by this paper
• The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain

  2019cited by this paper
• Immigration Reform and Farm Labor Markets

  2018cited by this paper
• Immigration Restrictions as Active Labor Market Policy: Evidence from the Mexican Bracero Exclusion.

  2018cited by this paper
• A Declining Farm Workforce: Analysis of Panel Data from Rural Mexico

  2016cited by this paper
• The hidden middle: the quiet revolution in the midstream of agrifood value chains in developing countries

  2015cited by this paper
• Collective bargaining in developing countries

  2015cited by this paper
• The Impact of Immigration Enforcement on the U.S. Farming Sector

  2014cited by this paper
• Trade Adjustment: Worker Level Evidence

  2014cited by this paper
• Why Do Fewer Agricultural Workers Migrate Now

  2014cited by this paper
• Thinking Through the Tomato Harvester

  2013cited by this paper
• Employment Protection versus Flexicurity: On Technology Adoption in Unionised Firms

  2012cited by this paper
• When the Levee Breaks: Black Migration and Economic Development in the American South

  2012cited by this paper
• The Gender Revolution

  2010cited by this paper
• Westernization of Asian Diets and the transformation of food systems: Implications for research and policy

  2007cited by this paper
• The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution

  2004cited by this paper
• Promise Unfulfilled: Unions, Immigration, and the Farm Workers

  2003cited by this paper
• Harvest mechanization helps agriculture remain competitive

  2000cited by this paper
• Worker Turnover, Farm Labor Contractors, and IRCA's Impact on the California Farm Labor Market

  1993cited by this paper
• Labor Unions and the Adoption of New Technology

  1987cited by this paper
• The Agricultural Mechanization Controversy

  1985cited by this paper
• Mechanical Harvesting and the California Tomato Industry: A Simulation Analysis

  1983cited by this paper
• Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester

  1970cited by this paper
• HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

  1957cited by this paper
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Economics Working Paper Series the China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States the China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States *

  year unknowncited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.