After surviving military rule for a decade under General Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan again transitioned to democracy in 1988 by holding four relatively free and fair elections, along with several rounds of peaceful power transfers. However, this steady progress of democratisation was cut short by a semi-system actor, the military, which often displays tendencies to intervene in the country’s political system. Using an actor-model of democratisation, this article contends that the military seized power because not enough political pressure was exerted by the weak system actors, which included country’s two largest political parties—Pakistan People’s Party and Pakistan Muslim League (N). Besides this, the actor-model perspective reveals that disunity, party factionalism, weak-intra-party democracy, governmental instability and corruption were responsible for offering the least resistance by the system actors. Furthermore, the article argues that the Muhajirs Quami Movement Party, the anti-system actor, did not have any impactful causal role in the country’s democratic breakdown.
Pakistan’s Democratic Breakdown of 1999: An Actor-Model Perspective
Published 2025 in South Asia Research
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2025
- Venue
South Asia Research
- Publication date
2025-07-01
- Fields of study
Not labeled
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-64 of 64 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
- No citing papers are available for this paper.
Showing 0-0 of 0 citing papers · Page 1 of 1