Do Developing Plant Branches Conform to a Single Allometric Growth Rule?

The use of physical models to predict patterns of organismal growth has long interested biologists. Models based on hydraulic or biomechanical principles have been invoked to predict the scaling of tree branching networks, but most assume self‐similarity throughout the network and don't consider more than a single physical constraint. A more recent model (flow similarity) predicts that the allometry of terminal tree branch dimensions will differ from the bole and basal branches, centering around values derived from hydraulic considerations. Here we evaluate the predictions of the flow similarity model for the growth of terminal stems of woody plants from 52 species sampled across the seed plant phylogeny and spanning over four orders of magnitude in stem volume. We find that the slopes describing terminal stem allometry across seed plants display limited variation, despite nearly 400 million years of divergent evolution across the examined lineages. Phylogenetic analysis reveals stable trait means and a strong pull towards specific values, potentially reflecting stabilising selection. Interestingly, these mean values are largely consistent with the flow similarity model predictions. Our results suggest that the ontogeny of terminal stems in seed plants follow similar allometric scaling principles which operate across evolutionary and ecological scales.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Plant, Cell and Environment

• Publication date

  2025-08-06

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/pce.70100PMID 40770690
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Phylogenomics and the rise of the angiosperms

  2024cited by this paper
• Flow similarity model predicts allometric size dependence, curvature, and covariation of 285 North American tree species

  2024cited by this paper
• Addressing controversies in the xylem embolism resistance - vessel diameter relationship.

  2023cited by this paper
• Flow similarity model predicts the allometry and allometric covariation of petiole dimensions

  2023cited by this paper
• The vulnerability to drought-induced embolism-conduit diameter link: breaching the anatomy-physiology divide

  2023cited by this paper
• A novel method for jointly modeling the evolution of discrete and continuous traits.

  2023influential reference
• TimeTree 5: An Expanded Resource for Species Divergence Times

  2022cited by this paper
• A bump in the node: the hydraulic implications of rhizomatous growth.

  2022cited by this paper
• Catastrophic hydraulic failure and tipping points in plants

  2021cited by this paper
• The Widened Pipe Model of plant hydraulic evolution

  2021cited by this paper
• Physiological rules for the heart, lungs and other pressure-based organs.

  2017cited by this paper
• Plant xylem hydraulics: What we understand, current research, and future challenges.

  2017cited by this paper
• An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV

  2016cited by this paper
• Flow similarity, stochastic branching, and quarter-power scaling in plants

  2015influential reference
• Tree Branching: Leonardo da Vinci's Rule versus Biomechanical Models

  2014cited by this paper
• The Influence of Branch Order on Optimal Leaf Vein Geometries: Murray’s Law and Area Preserving Branching

  2013cited by this paper
• An empirical assessment of tree branching networks and implications for plant allometric scaling models.

  2013influential reference
• Allometric Convergence in Savanna Trees and Implications for the Use of Plant Scaling Models in Variable Ecosystems

  2013influential reference
• Hormonal signals involved in the regulation of cambial activity, xylogenesis and vessel patterning in trees

  2013cited by this paper
• MODELING STABILIZING SELECTION: EXPANDING THE ORNSTEIN–UHLENBECK MODEL OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION

  2012cited by this paper
• From thin to thick: major transitions during stem development

  2012cited by this paper
• Testing the metabolic theory of ecology.

  2012cited by this paper
• Signal integration in the control of shoot branching

  2011cited by this paper
• Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees

  2010influential reference
• Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data

  2010cited by this paper
• Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants

  2010influential reference
• The metabolic theory of ecology: prospects and challenges for plant biology.

  2010cited by this paper
• Testing the Metabolic Scaling Theory of tree growth

  2009influential reference
• Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches

  2009cited by this paper
• Sizing Up Allometric Scaling Theory

  2008cited by this paper
• GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations

  2008cited by this paper
• Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees.

  2008cited by this paper
• Maintenance mechanisms of the pipe model relationship and Leonardo da Vinci’s rule in the branching architecture of Acer rufinerve trees

  2008cited by this paper
• Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry

  2006cited by this paper
• Convergent tapering of xylem conduits in different woody species.

  2006cited by this paper
• Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests.

  2006cited by this paper
• Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants

  2006cited by this paper
• Dependency of branch diameter growth in young Acer trees on light availability and shoot elongation.

  2005cited by this paper
• Biomechanical consequences of scaling

  2005cited by this paper
• Does water transport scale universally with tree size

  2005cited by this paper
• Plant allometry: is there a grand unifying theory?

  2004cited by this paper
• Twigs, trees, and the dynamics of carbon in the landscape

  2000influential reference
• The origin of universal scaling laws in biology

  1999cited by this paper
• A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems

  1999cited by this paper
• A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology

  1997cited by this paper
• Size-dependent Allometry of Tree Height, Diameter and Trunk-taper

  1995cited by this paper
• On growth and form

  1995cited by this paper
• Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process

  1995cited by this paper
• THE SCALING OF PLANT AND ANIMAL BODY MASS, LENGTH, AND DIAMETER

  1994cited by this paper
• INFLUENCE OF NEIGHBORS ON TREE FORM: EFFECTS OF LATERAL SHADE AND PREVENTION OF SWAY ON THE ALLOMETRY OF LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA (SWEET GUM)

  1989cited by this paper
• Size-dependent differential scaling in branches: the mechanical design of trees revisited

  1989cited by this paper
• Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design.

  1976influential reference
• Size and Shape in Biology

  1973cited by this paper
• A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES

  1964cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.