Explaining Holistic Essay Scores in Comparative Judgment Assessments by Predicting Scores on Rubrics

,

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.18653/v1/2025.bea-1.39
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Autoregressive Score Generation for Multi-trait Essay Scoring

  2024cited by this paper
• Unleashing Large Language Models' Proficiency in Zero-shot Essay Scoring

  2024cited by this paper
• An exploratory study of the construct measured by automated writing scores across task types and test occasions

  2023cited by this paper
• Prompt- and Trait Relation-aware Cross-prompt Essay Trait Scoring

  2023cited by this paper
• Automated Chinese Essay Scoring from Multiple Traits

  2022cited by this paper
• Critiquing the rationales for using comparative judgement: a call for clarity

  2022cited by this paper
• On the Use of Bert for Automated Essay Scoring: Joint Learning of Multi-Scale Essay Representation

  2022cited by this paper
• Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology

  2021influential reference
• Explainable Automated Essay Scoring: Deep Learning Really Has Pedagogical Value

  2020cited by this paper
• Can Neural Networks Automatically Score Essay Traits?

  2020cited by this paper
• Automated scoring of junior and senior high essays using Coh-Metrix features: Implications for large-scale language testing

  2020cited by this paper
• Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview

  2020cited by this paper
• Measuring conceptual understanding in randomised controlled trials: Can comparative judgement help?

  2019cited by this paper
• Using Adaptive Comparative Judgment in Writing Assessment: An Investigation of Reliability Among Interdisciplinary Evaluators

  2019cited by this paper
• Using adaptive comparative judgment for student formative feedback and learning during a middle school design project

  2019cited by this paper
• Automated Essay Scoring: A Survey of the State of the Art

  2019cited by this paper
• A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement

  2019cited by this paper
• Scale Separation Reliability: What Does It Mean in the Context of Comparative Judgment?

  2018influential reference
• Understanding Mean Score Differences Between the e‐rater® Automated Scoring Engine and Humans for Demographically Based Groups in the GRE® General Test

  2018cited by this paper
• LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree

  2017influential reference
• ReaderBench Learns Dutch: Building a Comprehensive Automated Essay Scoring System for Dutch Language

  2017cited by this paper
• Teksten beoordelen met criterialijsten of via paarsgewijze vergelijking: een afweging van betrouwbaarheid en tijdsinvestering

  2017influential reference
• Attention-based Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Essay Scoring

  2017cited by this paper
• ComPAIR: A New Online Tool Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement to Support Learning with Peer Feedback

  2017cited by this paper
• Validity of comparative judgement to assess academic writing: examining implications of its holistic character and building on a shared consensus

  2016influential reference
• Evaluating Comparative Judgment as an Approach to Essay Scoring

  2016cited by this paper
• A Neural Approach to Automated Essay Scoring

  2016cited by this paper
• Automatic Essay Scoring Based on Coh-Metrix Feature Selection for Chinese English Learners

  2016cited by this paper
• The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help?

  2015cited by this paper
• A Hierarchical Classification Approach to Automated Essay Scoring.

  2015cited by this paper
• Comparative Judgment Within Online Assessment: Exploring Students Feedback Reactions

  2015cited by this paper
• T-Scan: a new tool for analyzing Dutch text

  2014influential reference
• Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment

  2014cited by this paper
• Using digital representations of practical production work for summative assessment

  2014cited by this paper
• On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct

  2013cited by this paper
• Covering the Construct: An Approach to Automated Essay Scoring Motivated by a Socio-Cognitive Framework for Defining Literacy Skills

  2013cited by this paper
• Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

  2011influential reference
• Generalizability Theory and Classical Test Theory

  2010cited by this paper
• Complementing human judgment of essays written by English language learners with e-rater® scoring

  2010cited by this paper
• Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python

  2010influential reference
• Linguistic Features of Writing Quality

  2010cited by this paper
• Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments

  2010cited by this paper
• Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources

  2009cited by this paper
• CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF E‐RATER® IN SCORING TOEFL® ESSAYS

  2007cited by this paper
• An Overview of Automated Scoring of Essays.

  2006cited by this paper
• BEYOND ESSAY LENGTH: EVALUATING E-RATER®'S PERFORMANCE ON TOEFL® ESSAYS

  2004cited by this paper
• Automated Essay Evaluation: The Criterion Online Writing Service

  2004cited by this paper
• Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language

  2004cited by this paper
• Relations Between Writing Processes and Text Quality: When and How?

  1994cited by this paper
• Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

  1968cited by this paper
• On the possible psychophysical laws.

  1959cited by this paper
• RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS

  1952cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.