Outcome measurements in patients with a lumbar disc herniation – a scoping review

Introduction Outcome measurement is a cornerstone of modern medicine. A range of tools are commonly used for outcome assessment in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treatment. Research question What are the outcome measurement tools (OMTs) that have been used in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for LDH for the last 25 years? Material and methods The search covered only RCT of adult patients with LDH for the period January 01, 2000–December 31, 2024. Two authors reviewed independently the RCTs’ relevance to the topic of our scoping review. The reviewed and selected RCTs were analyzed, and relevant data was extracted, standardized and classified. Results We identified 168 RCTs and 29 outcome measurement tools covering 6 main domains: pain measurement – 6 tools, disability – 4 tools, quality of life – 2 tools, clinical parameters – 9 tools, psychological facet – 3 tools and self-perceived recovery – 5 tools. The number of tools used per RCT was most frequently 3 (26.2 %) or 4 (21.4 %). Discussion and conclusion Measuring outcome in patients with LDH is a complex and multidimensional task. The RCTs involving surgical treatment usually applied tools from 4 domains: pain, disability, clinical parameters and QOL. The most frequently used tools for the different domains were respectively: VAS, ODI, a mixture of clinical parameters and SF-36/12. A new group of outcome measuring tools based on computer adapted tests, wearable devices and digital outcome measures are on the horizon trying to impose new standards but their application needs further investigation.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Brain and Spine

• Publication date

  2025-08-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104380PMID 40822263PMCID 12356021
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Machine Learning Models Leveraging Smartphone-Based Patient Mobility Data Can Accurately Predict Functional Outcomes After Spine Surgery

  2024cited by this paper
• Impact of evidence-based guidelines on healthcare utilisation and costs for disc related sciatica in the Netherlands: a population-based, cross-sectional study

  2024cited by this paper
• Retrospective Study of Minimal Three-Year Follow-Up of Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: 5000 Multicenter Cases

  2023cited by this paper
• Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders.

  2023cited by this paper
• Smartphone-based activity tracking for spine patients: Current technology and future opportunities

  2023cited by this paper
• Impact of Insurance Type on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

  2022cited by this paper
• A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain

  2021cited by this paper
• From the Subjective to the Objective era of outcomes analysis: how the tools we use to measure outcomes must change to be reflective of the pathologies we treat in spinal surgery.

  2021cited by this paper
• The Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Spine: A Systematic Review

  2021cited by this paper
• Responsiveness of the self-measured 6-minute walking test and the Timed Up and Go test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders.

  2021cited by this paper
• A comparison between the low back pain scales for patients with lumbar disc herniation: validity, reliability, and responsiveness

  2020cited by this paper
• Comparing the reliability and validity of the SF-36 and SF-12 in measuring quality of life among adolescents in China: a large sample cross-sectional study

  2020cited by this paper
• How Should We Assess Pain: Do Patients Prefer a Quantitative or Qualitative Scale? A Study of Patient Preferences

  2020cited by this paper
• Longitudinal smartphone-based self-assessment of objective functional impairment in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: initial experience

  2020cited by this paper
• The Visual Analogue Scale Versus Numerical Rating Scale in Measuring Pain Severity and Predicting Disability in Low Back Pain

  2020cited by this paper
• Patient-reported outcomes in spine surgery: past, current, and future directions.

  2019cited by this paper
• Wearable Technology in Spine Surgery

  2019cited by this paper
• PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

  2018cited by this paper
• Prolonged Physiotherapy versus Early Surgical Intervention in Patients with Lumbar Disk Herniation: Short-term Outcomes of Clinical Randomized Trial

  2017cited by this paper
• Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

  2017influential reference
• The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

  2016cited by this paper
• The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity

  2016cited by this paper
• Psychometric Properties of the Pain Numeric Rating Scale When Applied to Multiple Body Regions among Professional Musicians

  2016cited by this paper
• Spontaneous Regression of Herniated Lumbar Disc with New Disc Protrusion in the Adjacent Level

  2016cited by this paper
• Spinal disorders, quality-based healthcare and spinal registers

  2015cited by this paper
• Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function and Pain CAT Instruments With Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Patients

  2015influential reference
• Difficulties in using Oswestry Disability Index in Indian patients and validity and reliability of translator-assisted Oswestry Disability Index

  2015influential reference
• When patients and surgeons disagree about surgical outcome: investigating patient factors and chart note communication

  2015cited by this paper
• A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain

  2015cited by this paper
• A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain

  2015influential reference
• The need for an objective outcome measurement in spine surgery--the timed-up-and-go test.

  2014cited by this paper
• Do preoperative fear avoidance model factors predict outcomes after lumbar disc herniation surgery? A systematic review

  2013cited by this paper
• Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.

  2013cited by this paper
• A study of the relationship among fear-avoidance beliefs, pain and disability index in patients with low back pain

  2013cited by this paper
• Effects of lumbar disk herniation on the careers of professional baseball players.

  2012cited by this paper
• Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

  2011cited by this paper
• Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial

  2011cited by this paper
• Quality-of-Life Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Lumbar Discectomy Using Short Form 36

  2011cited by this paper
• Systematic review of the effect of fusion added to discectomy compared with discectomy alone for lumbar disk prolapse surgery

  2011cited by this paper
• The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective. Part 1: The Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice

  2009cited by this paper
• Clinimetrics Corner: The Minimal Clinically Important Change Score (MCID): A Necessary Pretense

  2008cited by this paper
• The health status burden of people with fibromyalgia: a review of studies that assessed health status with the SF-36 or the SF-12

  2007cited by this paper
• Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery

  2005cited by this paper
• The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

  2000cited by this paper
• Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research: A Proposal for Standardized Use

  1998cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.