On Modeling Human Learning in Sequential Games with Delayed Reinforcements

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

• Publication date

  2013-10-13

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1109/SMC.2013.530
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Game theory.

  2011cited by this paper
• Short-term memory traces for action bias in human reinforcement learning.

  2007cited by this paper
• Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) :

  2007cited by this paper
• On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies.

  2005cited by this paper
• Experience‐weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games

  1999cited by this paper
• On the shape of the probability weighting function.

  1999cited by this paper
• The Probability Weighting Function

  1998cited by this paper
• Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria

  1998influential reference
• Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term*

  1995cited by this paper
• Q-learning

  1992influential reference
• Adaptive approaches to stochastic programming

  1991cited by this paper
• Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences

  1988cited by this paper
• Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47

  1979cited by this paper

• Optimal Decision-Making in Mixed-Agent Partially Observable Stochastic Environments via Reinforcement Learning

  2019cites this paper
• Comparing human behavior models in repeated Stackelberg security games: An extended study

  2016cites this paper
• Learning to Act Optimally in Partially Observable Multiagent Settings: (Doctoral Consortium)

  2016cites this paper
• Evaluating and Improving Probability Assessment in an Ambiguous, Sequential Environment

  2015cites this paper