PPI or PR? The Fine Line Between Inclusion and Illusion

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Methods in Psychology

• Publication date

  2025-09-01

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.metip.2025.100203
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Evaluating a grant development public involvement funding scheme: a qualitative document analysis

  2024cited by this paper
• Researching minoritised communities in palliative care: An agenda for change

  2022cited by this paper
• PPI in research: a reflection from early stage researchers

  2019cited by this paper
• How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research

  2018cited by this paper
• GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research

  2017cited by this paper
• Pros and cons of different sampling techniques

  2017cited by this paper
• Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK‐based qualitative interview study

  2016cited by this paper
• From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement

  2016cited by this paper
• ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research

  2015cited by this paper
• Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and what are the benefits?

  2014cited by this paper
• Considering Confirmation Bias in Design and Design Research

  2013cited by this paper
• Credibility and the ‘professionalized’ lay expert: Reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research

  2012cited by this paper
• Scoping Review and Approach to Appraisal of Interventions Intended to Involve Patients in Patient Safety

  2010cited by this paper
• What Patients Want: Consumer Involvement in the Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Oxygen Supplementation After Acute Stroke

  2006cited by this paper
• Schematic Bases of Belief Change

  1984cited by this paper
• Reasons for confidence.

  1980cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.