Non-Western and Western Theories of Peace

This paper examines the divergent yet complementary approaches to peace in Western and non-Western theoretical traditions. Western theories—such as Democratic Peace Theory, Liberal Institutionalism, and Galtung’s Positive/Negative Peace—emphasize structural, state-centric mechanisms, including democratic governance, international organizations, and institutional justice. In contrast, non-Western philosophies—Ubuntu, Ahimsa, Confucian Harmony, Islamic Sulh, Indigenous Restorative Justice, and Buddhist Peace Theory—prioritize relational, spiritual, and communal dimensions of peace, focusing on interconnectedness, nonviolence, ethical harmony, and restorative dialogue. By juxtaposing these frameworks, the study reveals how Western models often address macro-level stability while non-Western traditions cultivate micro-level transformation. Ultimately, the paper argues for an integrated paradigm of peace that synthesizes institutional rigor with cultural and spiritual wisdom, offering a holistic response to global conflict.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

• Publication date

  2025-08-20

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.14738/assrj.1208.19180
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The little book of restorative justice

  2002cited by this paper
• The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85

  1998influential reference
• CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS

  1995cited by this paper
• Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict

  1994cited by this paper

• Peace and Conflict: A Look at my Own Backyard

  2025cites this paper