Communicating a common front: mainstream party rhetoric and affective polarisation towards the radical right

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  West European Politics

• Publication date

  2025-09-03

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1080/01402382.2025.2531711
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Does mainstream populism work? Populist rhetoric and the electoral fortunes of mainstream parties

  2025cited by this paper
• The politics of seeking and avoiding discourse in parliament

  2025cited by this paper
• United in success, fragmented in failure: The moderating effect of perceived government performance on affective polarization between coalition partners

  2025cited by this paper
• The Normalization of the Radical Right

  2024cited by this paper
• Why accommodate? How niche pressure and intra-party divisions shape mainstream party strategies

  2024cited by this paper
• The challenger advantage – how challenger parties disrupt mainstream party dominance in the European Parliament

  2024cited by this paper
• Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems

  2023cited by this paper
• Validating the feeling thermometer as a measure of partisan affect in multi-party systems

  2022cited by this paper
• Creating and Comparing Dictionary, Word Embedding, and Transformer-Based Models to Measure Discrete Emotions in German Political Text

  2022cited by this paper
• Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties

  2022cited by this paper
• The Variable Persuasiveness of Political Rhetoric

  2022cited by this paper
• Persuasion in Parallel

  2022cited by this paper
• Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies

  2022cited by this paper
• Partisan Affect in Times of Fractionalization: Visualizing Who Likes Whom in Germany, 1977 to 2020

  2022cited by this paper
• Negative campaigning

  2022cited by this paper
• Parliamentary Representation and the Normalization of Radical Right Support

  2021cited by this paper
• Beyond Policy: The Use of Social Group Appeals in Party Communication

  2021cited by this paper
• Affective Polarization and the Populist Radical Right: Creating the Hating?

  2021cited by this paper
• Ticking all the boxes? A comparative study of social sorting and affective polarization

  2021cited by this paper
• Fragmented foes: Affective polarization in the multiparty context of the Netherlands

  2021cited by this paper
• Competing for Loyalists? How Party Positioning Affects Populist Radical Right Voting

  2021cited by this paper
• How Do Mainstream Parties ‘Become’ Mainstream, and Pariah Parties ‘Become’ Pariahs? Conceptualizing the Processes of Mainstreaming and Pariahing in the Labelling of Political Parties

  2021cited by this paper
• Causal Inference with Latent Treatments

  2021cited by this paper
• “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”: A Panel Study on the Reciprocal Effects of Negative, Dirty, and Positive Campaigning on Political Distrust

  2021cited by this paper
• Political Entrepreneurs

  2020cited by this paper
• American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

  2020cited by this paper
• How Political Parties Shape Public Opinion in the Real World

  2020cited by this paper
• Affective polarization in multiparty systems

  2020cited by this paper
• Social divides in the age of globalization

  2019cited by this paper
• Does ostracism affect party support? Comparative lessons and experimental evidence

  2019cited by this paper
• Tainted Love : How Stigmatization of a Political Party in News Media Reduces Its Electoral Support

  2019cited by this paper
• ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems

  2019cited by this paper
• Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?

  2019cited by this paper
• Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities

  2018cited by this paper
• Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps

  2018cited by this paper
• How established parties reduce other parties’ electoral support: the strategy of parroting the pariah

  2018cited by this paper
• Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity

  2018cited by this paper
• Rousing the Partisan Combatant: Elite Incivility, Anger, and Antideliberative Attitudes

  2018cited by this paper
• The Polarizing Effects of Online Partisan Criticism: Evidence from Two Experiments

  2018cited by this paper
• The Politics of Competence: Parties, Public Opinion and Voters

  2017cited by this paper
• Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups

  2017cited by this paper
• “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization

  2015cited by this paper
• Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization

  2015cited by this paper
• The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties on the Positions of Mainstream Parties Regarding Multiculturalism

  2015cited by this paper
• Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems

  2014cited by this paper
• Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the Use of Incivility in Political Expression

  2014cited by this paper
• Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts

  2013cited by this paper
• Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization

  2012cited by this paper
• A losing gamble. How mainstream parties facilitate anti-immigrant party success

  2012cited by this paper
• Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech

  2012cited by this paper
• Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe

  2010cited by this paper
• If you can't Beat them, Join them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe

  2010cited by this paper
• Being intolerant of the intolerant. The exclusion of Western European anti-immigration parties and its consequences for party choice

  2009cited by this paper
• Coalition Formation and Congruence in a Multi-layered Setting: Belgium 1995–2008

  2009cited by this paper
• Reacting to the Radical Right

  2007cited by this paper
• The Party as Pariah: The Exclusion of Anti-Immigration Parties and its Effect on their Ideological Positions

  2007cited by this paper
• When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition

  2007cited by this paper
• How Effective is the Cordon Sanitaire? Lessons from Efforts to Contain the Far Right in Belgium, France, Denmark and Norway

  2006cited by this paper
• On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?

  2001cited by this paper
• Experiments in intergroup discrimination.

  1970cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.