Conceptual Evolution, Governance Transformation, and Spatial Planning Approaches for Protected Area–Community Conservation–Livelihood Trade-Offs

As protected areas (PAs) expand globally at an accelerating rate, reconciling biodiversity conservation with socioeconomic development in adjacent communities has become a critical challenge for landscape sustainability. This systematic review synthesizes literature (1990–2025) to trace three interconnected transitions: (1) the conceptual evolution from exclusionary to inclusive PA–community paradigms, grounded in shifting perceptions of cultural landscapes; (2) the governance transformation from tokenistic participation to power-sharing co-management frameworks; and (3) the spatial planning progression from fragmented “island” models to integrated protected area networks (PANs) leveraging ecological corridors. Our analysis reveals that disconnected PA–community relationships exacerbate conservation–development conflicts, particularly where cultural landscapes are undervalued. A key finding is that cultural–natural synergies act as pivotal mediators for conservation efficacy, necessitating context-adaptive governance approaches. This study advances landscape planning theory by proposing a rural landscape network framework that integrates settlement patches, biocultural corridors, and PA matrices to optimize ecological connectivity while empowering communities. Empirical insights from China highlight pathways to harmonize stringent protection with rural revitalization, underscoring the capacity of PANs to bridge spatial and socio-institutional divides. This synthesis provides a transformative lens for policymakers to scale locally grounded solutions across global conservation landscapes.

• Publication year

  2025

• Venue

  Land

• Publication date

  2025-09-03

• Fields of study

  Not labeled

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3390/land14091797
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The role of communities in the governance of China's national parks and the consolidation and development of their role

  2024cited by this paper
• Conservation and human rights: The public commitments of international conservation organizations

  2024cited by this paper
• Exploring residents' perceptions of ecosystem services in nature reserves to guide protection and management

  2024cited by this paper
• Participation in protected area governance: A systematic case survey of the evidence on ecological and social outcomes.

  2023cited by this paper
• The cooperative development relationship between Nature Reserves and local communities

  2023cited by this paper
• Sustainable protected areas: Synergies between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic development

  2022cited by this paper
• The origin, practice and evolvement of conservation-compatible idea

  2022cited by this paper
• Effectiveness of the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve of China in Reducing Human Impacts

  2022cited by this paper
• Adapting traditional industries to national park management: A conceptual framework and insights from two Chinese cases

  2022cited by this paper
• A conceptual framework and research method for understanding protected area governance: varying approaches and epistemic worldviews about human-nature relations

  2022cited by this paper
• Comparing the Marine Protected Area Network Planning Process in British Columbia, Canada and New Zealand – Planning for cooperative partnerships with Indigenous communities

  2021cited by this paper
• Ecotourism development in Ethiopia: costs and benefits for protected area conservation

  2020cited by this paper
• Summary comments on assessment methods of ecosystem integrity for national parks

  2019cited by this paper
• The National Estate (and the city), 1969–75: a significant Australian heritage phenomenon

  2019cited by this paper
• Terms of empowerment: of conservation or communities?

  2019cited by this paper
• From biocenosis to ecosystem: The theory trend of conserving ecosystem integrity in national parks

  2019cited by this paper
• One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure

  2018cited by this paper
• Protected areas and territorial exclusion of traditional communities: analyzing the social impacts of environmental compensation strategies in Brazil

  2018cited by this paper
• Fauna of the National Parks of the United States: A Preliminary Survey of Faunal Relations in National Parks

  2017cited by this paper
• Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity

  2017cited by this paper
• Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China

  2017cited by this paper
• On public participation in the construction of national parks

  2017cited by this paper
• A Review on the Research of Natural Protected National Park

  2017cited by this paper
• Models and Approaches for Integrating Protected Areas with Their Surroundings: A Review of the Literature

  2015cited by this paper
• Local communities and protected areas: The mediating role of place attachment for pro-environmental civic engagement

  2014cited by this paper
• Exploring the Relationship Between Local Support and the Success of Protected Areas

  2013cited by this paper
• Beyond Prescription: Community Engagement in the Planning and Management of National Parks as Tourist Destinations

  2013cited by this paper
• Factors Affecting the Success of Conserving Biodiversity in National Parks: A Review of Case Studies from Africa

  2013cited by this paper
• Practices and Trends Analysis of Community Planning for Chinese Natural World Heritage Properties

  2012cited by this paper
• Protected Areas and Local Communities: an Inevitable Partnership toward Successful Conservation Strategies?

  2012cited by this paper
• Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future

  2010cited by this paper
• US National Park Buffer Zones: Historical, Scientific, Social, and Legal Aspects

  1999cited by this paper
• National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements

  1999cited by this paper

• No citing papers are available for this paper.